r 2018 16:33:27 +0000 What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning? Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel lachine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think of it more of a space / field effects , Not recursiv

matical results--that a trivial extension of theory deeply deforms the underlying structure of the logic--this to me would be more astonishing than Goedel's proof and if i could understand it would be the first to congratulate you. EFTA_R1_01487776 EFTA02421479

=Joscha Bach > wrote: What do you think of as space/field effects? The univ=rse or earning. Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel Machine?<=r> > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com» wrote: > I would think of it more of a sp

ic approaches have been found, especially computation and =ybernetics. But physics fizzled: Einstein's and Maxwell's universes =ould not be unified. Goedel ruined the party in mathematics. =ybernetics got lost in complexity theory. Minsky's Al and Chomsky's =inguistics seemed to have failed. And at the

an make of oneself is > oneself itself. • This self-referential conclusion is the basis for a number of famous > mathematical theorems, including Goedel's incompleteness theorem and > the halting problem. But its primary expression in everyday life is > the undecidability of decisions before they ar