Epstein Secrets

From: To: Paula And Pat Garrity < Subject: Fwd: Jeffrey Epstein owes crisis p.r. firm $103K (NY Post) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:06:33 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png This is why Chet (Chester) Brewer called m

From: To: Paula And Pat Garrity < Subject: Fwd: Jeffrey Epstein owes crisis p.r. firm $103K (NY Post) Da

at 7:02:54 AM EST To: Convicted sex offender Jeffre pstein is a deadbeat as well as a pen, according to a California legal complaint against him. Epstein allegedly owes $103,500 — presumably chump change for the "billionaire" — to crisis p.r. firm Sitrick & Co., which the ex-con hired after a wave of

ruled oily Epstein can now be deposed in the case no matter where he lives. Epstein's lawyer Chester Brewer Jr. didn't return calls. Sitrick lawyer Lance Shinder declined to comment. Lauren Willis I 680 Washington Blvd I Stamford. CT 06901 I It (203) 302-7321 I c (212) 920-9488 AIM WillisSLS ;Description:

From: Ike Groff < > To: Lesley Groff <1 > Subject: Fwd: Jeffrey Epstein owes crisis p.r. firm $103K (NY Post) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:02:54 +0000 Attachments: image001.png Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message

Groff < > To: Lesley Groff <1 > Subject: Fwd: Jeffrey Epstein owes crisis p.r. firm $103K (NY Post) Da

firm $103K (NY Post) Convicted sex offender Jeffre pstein is a deadbeat as well as a perv, according to a California legal complaint against him. Epstein allegedly owes $103,500 — presumably chump change for the "billionaire" — to crisis p.r. firm Sitrick & Co., which the ex-con hired after a wave of

ruled oily Epstein can now be deposed in the case no matter where he lives. Epstein's lawyer Chester Brewer Jr. didn't return calls. Sitrick lawyer Lance Shinder declined to comment. Lauren Willis 1680 Washington Blvd I Stamford. CT 06901 I AIM WillisSLS Description: Description: This e-mail and any file

From: Mike Sitrick < Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:31 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Sure From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:30 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re:

, 2015 4:30 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up can you speak now?. > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Mike Sitrick < <mailto » wrote: Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your information is incorrect. Although I think it is unproductive at this late stage to re-harsh what has

pt to understand where we are.Your email that you sent to me did not agree with the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01306408

seeking the fees awarded by the judgment, plus the fees and costs paid since the entry of the judgment. Regarding the amounts paid at that time to Lance Shinder, even though he is entitled to and will be paid more on this file, I am only seeking part of his fees as a courtesy to you. I hope this helps. Jef

m you this week, I will know that was and is still your intent. Best regards, Mike From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 9:06 AM To: 'jeffrey E.' Subject: RE: Follow up Jeffrey I am in the midst of another client project but will get answers to you shortly. 2 EFTA_R1_01630960 EFTA02502593

From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:22 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your information is incorrect. Although I think it is unproductive at this late stage to re•harsh what has

pt to understand where we are.Your email that you sent to me did not agree with the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you

seeking the fees awarded by the judgment, plus the fees and costs paid since the entry of the judgment. Regarding the amounts paid at that time to Lance Shinder, even though he is entitled to and will be paid more on this file, I am only seeking part of his fees as a courtesy to you. I hope this helps. Jef

From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:43 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Off now From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:30 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: R

l 21, 2015 4:30 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up can you speak now?. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Mike Sitrick <mailto: » wrote: Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your information is incorrect. Although I think it is unproductive at this late stage to re-harsh what has

pt to understand where we are.Your email that you sent to me did not agree with the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01632846

seeking the fees awarded by the judgment, plus the fees and costs paid since the entry of the judgment. Regarding the amounts paid at that time to Lance Shinder, even though he is entitled to and will be paid more on this file, I am only seeking part of his fees as a courtesy to you. I hope this helps. Jef

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Mike Sitrick Subjec

. Michael, as I said, I would like to resolve this matter, . getting the facts straight will go a long way to getting it done. sorry for the mess. Jeffrey please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information

sum of what roy had paid you. in 05-7 3. oddly Your email did not agree with the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. If you were ope

From: Mike Sitrick To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Follow up Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:06:16 +0000 Jeffrey I am in the midst of another client project but will get answers to you shortly. Mike From: Jeffrey E. linallto:[email protected]] Sent: Mond

From: Mike Sitrick To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Follow up Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:06:16 +0000 Jeffrey I am in the midst of another client project but will g

pt to understand where we are.Your email that you sent to me did not agree with the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 4:02 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up not at all i sent an email to you on thurs,

Michael, as I said, I would like to resolve this matter, . getting th= facts straight will go a long way to getting it done. sorry for the=20 mess. Jeffrey On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Mike Sitrick wrote: Jeffrey EFTA_R1_01632371 EFTA02503541 You said you would get back to me Friday. I'm assu

pt to understa=d where we are.Your email that you sent to me did not agree wi=h the email that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you