Epstein Secrets

ackground surrounding the Razorback Creditor's motion is important to the Court's ultimate resolution of that motion. It is therefore set out here: Epstein's Sexual Abuse Victims Obtain Legal Representation from Bradley Edwards I. Between approximately August 2002 and September 2005, Jeffrey Epstein se

w Involved with Teenage Girls? Pervert's Aide Quizzed Over Prince, Mirror (UK), March 14, 2011, at 11 (discussing involvement of Prince Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein's sexual affairs); Bill Knew, Says Perv's Masseuse, New York Post, March 7, 2011, at 7 (discussing former President Bill Clinton's knowledge of Epste

Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, defendant Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida sta

een approximately August 2002 and September 2005, Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted L.M., who was then a

very matter arising purely under state law claims filed in state court. The Razorback Creditors in essence are seeking to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. For reasons of comity alone

2 of 10 privilege and/or attorney work product. II. Background 3. Movant, L.M. is a party plaintiff in a civil lawsuit' against party defendant Jeffrey Epstein in which she alleges that Epstein sexually exploited, abused, and/or assaulted her when she was a minors. The parties recently reached a confidentia

ereof, states as follows: I. Introduction 1. Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, seeks to pull the wool over the eyes of this honorable Court. Epstein asks this Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the Circuit Court over a subpoena duces tecum issued by the state court in connectio

STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Movant, L.M., moves this Court pursuant

er arising purely under state law claims filed in state court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the honorable Ci

. Link & Rockenbach, PA A ellate Counsel for Petitioner EFTA00793730 INTRODUCTION In this Emergency Petition for a writ of mandamus, Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiff/counter-defendant below, challenges the circuit court's Order entered March 8, 2018, by the Honorable Donald Hafele, denying Epstein'

Epstein, the plaintiff/counter-defendant below, challenges the circuit court's Order entered March 8, 2018, by the Honorable Donald Hafele, denying Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440. Epstein requests Emergency treatment because

Case No.: LT Case No: 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHST

reversible error if this action proceeds to trial on March 13, 2018. Appellate Courts are Clean Strict Compliance with Rule 1.440 is Mandatory and the Circuit Court's Failure to Follow the Rule Warrants Mandamus Relief This Court, in particular, has spoken on the "mandatory" nature of the timing of Rule 1.440, an