Epstein Secrets

Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:26:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Jacquie — Does that apply to Rolando's emai

a search of e-mails of the previous U.S. Attorneys in Miami. OPR received an allegation of misconduct, and they asked for e-mails pertaining to the Epstein case, presumably so they could determine whether to open a full investigation. Since OPR was seeking preliminary information, they asked me to obt

Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-000

USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need to double check wall I believe what happens is that TechOne provides access to their account data to someone on staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether a

From: " (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CNt To: USAFLS)" "-(USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:16:07 +0000 Importance: Normal lli has had all contact with OPR, so I do not

S)" "-(USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Date:

: USAFLS)" "-(USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-000

010-FLS-0004 (USAFLS) I don't have Attachment 1 or 5 for a .a Isallflor all no longer with us. and served as USA and their email should be at TechOne. How do we go about finding out if archived email for nd exist in our system. How about gettingand mails for review, I understand OPR is asking.

From: To: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:26:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi — Does that apply to email, too? Or only

a search of e-mails of the previous U.S. Attorneys in Miami. OPR received an allegation of misconduct, and they asked for e-mails pertaining to the Epstein case, presumably so they could determine whether to open a full investigation. Since OPR was seeking preliminary information, they asked me to obt

From: To: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-000

USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need to double check with I believe what happens is that TechOne provides access to their account data to someone ore staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether

greatly appreciated. From: (USAFLS) <JVarela@ usa.doj.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:25 PM To: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold U 2010-FLS-0004 (USAFLS) EFTA00206220

o: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold U 2010-FLS-0004 (USAF

25 PM To: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold U 2010-FLS-000

USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need to double check with I believe what happens is that TechOne provides access to their account data to someone on staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether a

Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax From: Sent: To: Subject: I I: (USAFLS) Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:16 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request/ Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 fl has had all contact with OPR, so I do not know. (USAFLS) Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00206223

M To: Weeks, (USAMD) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Litigation Hold Documents from Hi — may have a

ruary 23, 2011 1:16 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request/ Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004

USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need to double check with I believe what happens is that TechOne provides access to their account data to someone on staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether a

1:06 PM To: I . (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Subject: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-000

Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:06 PM To: I . (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Subject: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 (USAFLS) Ann Please note that per EOUSA Preservation Officer, EOUSA will be the one doing the search

To: I . (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Subject: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 (USAF

USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need to double check with I believe what happens is that TechOne provides access to their account data to someone on staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether a

To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (FBI) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein — OPR Request Attachments: 201102231217

. I told him that was not likely to happen. Cassell then suggested that the United States Government should step aside and allow them to "go after" Epstein to get the agreement set aside. I asked him how he expected that would be done, since the only parties to the Non-Prosecution Agreement were Epstei

. I can be reached at . Thanks. From: (USAFLS) c > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:38 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (FBI) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein — OPR Request Attachments: 20110223121742706.pdf (USAFLS) Hi and — These are the relevant items that I found in my stored emails. A hard copy a

) I don't have Attachment 1 or 5 for Alex Acosta, MSloman, Or all no longer with us. Acosta and Sloman served as USA and their email should be at TechOne. How do we go about finding out if archived email for and exist in our system. How about getting Acosta and Sloman emails for review, I understan