Epstein Secrets

Jeffrey E. Epstein Tit Vidard [IODIC Four Hundred Pk-seven Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 To Whom It May Concern: I Jeffrey E. Epstein authorize Mr. Wayne

nu SHIPPERIEXPORTER LSJ LLC 4100 REOHOOK QUARTER CHARLOTTE AMALIE vi 110801 ST THOMAS. (MY' CONSLONELIONDT NEGOTIABLE UNLESS COMO-NEST° ORDER, EPSTEIN. JEFFREY 358 EL BRILLO WAY RIVIERA BEACH FL 33401 MITE() STATES FORWARDING AOINDFAIC NO. scant ?ARTY EPSTEIN. JEFFREY RIVIERA REACH a 33401 I

Jeffrey E. Epstein Tit Vidard [IODIC Four Hundred Pk-seve

Jeffrey E. Epstein Tit Vidard [IODIC Four Hundred Pk-seven

# 1, North Palm Beach, Florida 33408 PHONE: FAX: PURCHASE & SALES AGREEMENT Agreement made this 12th day of February, 2007, between: L.S.J. LLC (Hereinafter referred to as Buyer) and Owner of Record (Hereinafter referred to it; Seller) 1. The Buyer agrees to purchase and the Seller agrees to sell all r

ent 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05:14:2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.

ases shall be styled with all of the case names and numbers, consistent with the styling of this Order, and shall be FILED ONLY IN Jane Doe No. 21. Epstein, case no. 08-80119, which is the lowest-numbered pending case. Any motions styled incorrectly or filed in multiple cases will be stricken from the d

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,

follows: I. The above-styled cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for purposes of discovery and for procedural motions that relate to multiple cases. 2. Hereinafter, all motions and other court filings that relate to discovery and all procedural motions that relate to multiple cases shall be styled with all of t

=Prince Andrew, which was taken in New York's Central Park last December, th= spokesman told me, "Don't expect to see a photo of [Prince Andrew and=Jeffrey Epstein) together." I asked the spokesman: "Does that mea= that Andrew has broken off all contact with Epstein?" The spokesman r=plied: "Hereinafter, we won

to see a photo of [Prince Andrew and=Jeffrey Epstein) together." I asked the spokesman: "Does that mea= that Andrew has broken off all contact with Epstein?" The spokesman r=plied: "Hereinafter, we won't see a photo." I took this exchange =o leave open the possibility that Andrew is still loyal to you a

on't expect to see a photo of [Prince Andrew and=Jeffrey Epstein) together." I asked the spokesman: "Does

and=Jeffrey Epstein) together." I asked the spokesman: "Does that mea= that Andrew has broken off all contact with Epstein?" The spokesman r=plied: "Hereinafter, we won't see a photo." I took this exchange =o leave open the possibility that Andrew is still loyal to you and intends =o carry on his friendship

rd Snowden,” Guardian, July 17, 2014. http://www.activistpost.com/2014/07/new-guardian-interview-with-edward.html “Dominique Strauss-Kahn....”—Edward Jay Epstein, “What Really Happed To Strauss- Kahn” New York Review of Books, December 22, 2011 “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau...”—Newt Gingrich, “A Gover

ward.html “Dominique Strauss-Kahn....”—Edward Jay Epstein, “What Really Happed To Strauss- Kahn” New York R

ite between May 2001 and May 2012. His posts are quoted by Joe Mullins, “NSA leaker Ed Snowden’s life on Ars Technica,” Ars 7echnica, June 13, 3013. (Hereinafter cited as Ars Technica report.) http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/nsa-leaker-ed- snowdens-life-on-ars-technica 8. “Ben Wizner, a lawyer...”-