Epstein Secrets

the outcome of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....1.„ , ‘,1„ 1. 14.

come of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....1.„ , ‘,1„ 1. 14. Sloman, Jef

7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....1.„ , ‘,1„ 1. 14. Sloman, Jeffrey 15. 101010MRNI,PIIIIMP 16. Weinberg, Martin C-1 of 2 EFTA00209568 17. Doe No. 1, Jane 18. Doe No. 2, Jane Note: As they have in the court bel

r rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of the victims and notified them that they were protected "victims" under the CVRA. The Office, however, ultimately reached a plea dea

No. 13-12923 IN THE Iluiteb Mateo Court of appeato FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. I AND JANE DOE NO. 2, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees Defendant-Appellee Intervenors-Appellants MOTION TO DISMISS NON-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JA

ane Doe No. 2 ("the victims") respectfully file this opposition to the motion for a stay pending appeal filed by intervenors- appellants' Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein and Martin Weinberg (collectively referred to as "Epstein"). At issue is correspondence between federal prosecutors and Epstein's criminal defense

the motion for a stay pending appeal filed by intervenors- appellants' Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein and Martin Weinberg (collectively referred to as "Epstein"). At issue is correspondence between federal prosecutors and Epstein's criminal defense attorneys concerning plea negotiations. The victims have a

peal filed by intervenors- appellants' Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein and Martin Weinberg (collectively referre

926, 13-12928 IN THE Einiteb ibtateo Court of appeato FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees Defendant-Appellee Intervenors-Appellants OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY ORDER PENDING APPEAL

e government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed. In support of the motion, the victims note that initial Supplemental Briefing from Epstein they are responding to (DE 94) is 23 pages long. The Government's response (DE 100) supports many of Epstein's arguments and is 11 pages long. As a

TATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them fiv