Epstein Secrets

Jeffrey Epstein Witnessed by: Jack Goldberger, Esquire EFTA00215429 July 9, 2008 Assistant United States Attorney est P m eac on a 3411 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY 't JACK A.GOLDBERGER JASON S.WEISS Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney T Minter of New jersey & Florida Bars Thank

ay: 300 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340! August 13, 2008 As per your request, I am attaching several documents related to Mr. Epstein's performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The first document attached hereto is the June 30, 2008 proposed Notification, which was hand-deli

ted States Attorney est P m eac on a 3411 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY 't JACK A.G

ted States Attorney est P m eac on a 3411 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY 't JACK A.GO

uest, I am attaching several documents related to Mr. Epstein's performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. / FILED by D.C. JUL - 9 2008 STEVEN M. LARIA108E CLERK U S DIST. CT S.D. OF FLA • W P8 DECLARATION 1: a IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM RIG

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

ork County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 r efu I wit *grant gratrt APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant -Appellant. BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JAY P. LEFKOWITZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Aven

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant -Appellant. BR

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant -Appellant. BRI

ARRA JANE DOE NI and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by D.C. JUN 1 8 2013 STEVEN M LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT S 0 of FLA - W PB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: I. The pe

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by • D.C. JUN I 8 2013 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT. S D of FLA -WPB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The pet

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by • D.C. JUN I 8 2013 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT. S D of FLA -WPB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The pet

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by • D.C. JUN I 8 2013 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT. S D of FLA -WPB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The pet

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by • D.C. JUN I 8 2013 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT. S D of FLA -WPB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The pet

rsons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys), and c. Produce all other responsive documents in response to all outstanding requests for production of documents. To the extent any

JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by • D.C. JUN I 8 2013 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT. S D of FLA -WPB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The pet