Epstein Secrets

— a similar effort to intervene on a "reputational" claim. That claim was made by Bruce Reinhart who — like Dershowitz — had previously represented Jeffrey Epstein's interests in related litigation. Reinhart moved to intervene in this case to contest the victims' allegations that Reinhart (a former prosecutor in

attempted to block discovery of materials in this case, leading to an Eleventh Circuit ruling that the victims' discovery efforts were proper. Doe'. Epstein, 749 F.3d 999 (1 1 th Cir. 2014). 3 Remarkably, even though the Court directed the Government to begin producing discovery in June 2013, the Govern

e criminal prosecution broke) Dershowitz stated "I'm on my 20th book. . . . The only person outside of my immediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey." The Talented Mr. Epstein, by Vicky Ward, in Vanity Fair (Jan. 2005)21 Dershowitz has also been quoted as saying that, even if Epstein went bankrup

n asked: Do you know what Jeffrey Epstein's relationship is with Alan Dershowitz? That's somebody [i.e., Dershowitz] who you know to have stayed at Jeffery Epstein's house on many occasions, correct? And also somebody who you know to have been at the house when E.W. was in Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom getting sexua

in took the Fifth when asked during his deposition "[h]ave you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18?" Jeffrey Epstein Depo. at 90, Epstein'. Edwards, No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB (Palm. Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Mar. 17, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a ste

tance. She was sexually trafficked and abused by Mr. Epstein (and others at the direction of Mr. Epstein) not

ediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey." The Talented Mr. Epstein, by Vicky Ward, in Vanity Fair (Jan. 2005)21 Der

a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than everything. . ." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States' Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en banc Court considered whether and to wha

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.3 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

s ttorney's Office Southern District of Florida Jeffrey Epstein Dear We write as counsel to Jeffrey Eps

very special thanks to generous support gil et”ey Epstein. for making this meeting happen. This meeting wa

mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing . . . and less than everything. .." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States v. Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en banc Court considered whether and to wha

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

ourl Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Illt hope you had a great holiday season. Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak with you early next week on the Epstein matter. if you provide me with some convenient dates and times for us to call you, I will coordinate with Gerry and confirm same. regards Lilly A

_CE08_00079 EFTA00184637 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-46 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 5 of 24 LAW DAVICCII or ALD B. LEFCOURT. PC. Jeffrey Matthew Esq. Andrew Laurie. Esq. Esq. The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 6, 2007 Page 4 The bulk impor

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

. Declining To Prosecute as an Exercise of Discretion Epstein is being prosecuted by state authorities in Florida. Even if we assume aiguendo that Epslein's conduct constitutes a federal crime that can be proven, nevertheless no "substantial Federal interest" would be served by prosecuting him. On this

y a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more thy' nothing ... and less than everything. .." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States" Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en ham: Court considered whether and to wha

RENATO C. STABILE ada•Okoltostaa. corn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN Mearnageskeurstet teen BY FEDERAL EXPRESS ear T essrs. oman, T enc e an July 6, 2007 rey Epstein uric and Ms. Villafaila: HONE I/ zJ 7370400 FAcSIMILE 421211388.6102 We %Tice as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on Ju

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.5 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. I stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading o

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. I stretched to rea

FAcSIMILE 421211388.6102 We %Tice as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on June 26,

mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more that nothing . . . ancliess than everything. .." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States I Ballinger, 395 I3d 1218 (1 1 th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en bane Court considered whether and to wh

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.5 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

ERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attor

y a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than everything..." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States'. Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en banc Court considered whether and to wha

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

ralian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs.= and and Ms. We write as counsel to Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on June 26, 2007. We thought the meeting was extremely productive and appreciate your giving us the opportunity to enga

Palm Beach, Florida 33401 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs.= and and Ms. We write as

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than everything..." (O'Connor, J. dissenting). United States v. Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2005), illustrates the difficulty of the task. In that case, the deeply split en Banc Court considered whether and to wha

From: story cowles To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Info on Ballinger from Susan Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:58:17 +0000 Attachments: CCE00025.pdf - - On Mon, 8/3/09,

From: story cowles To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Info on Balling

From: story cowles To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Info on

From: story cowles To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Info on Ballinger from Susan Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:58:17 +0000 Attachments: CCE00025.pdf - - On Mon, 8/3/09, Susan Polan <ti l> wrote: From: Susan Polan Sub'e

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Mon 10/26/2009 8:05:38 PM Subject Re: Saturday house hunting gosman called and asked me for him to take me to see clark and i said no, i had

-3 pm- confirmed 1500 S Ocean Blvd, PB (James H Clark) - 4 pm -still tentative or, if not, 1220 S Ocean Blvd (Swanson asks $75M). BTW, Please tell Jeffrey that the Ballinger house contract was revived after a difficult due diigence period. Buyer is Richard Kurtz, a NJ real estate developer who owns gar

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Mon 10/26/2009 8:05:38 PM Subject Re: Sat

1500 S Ocean Blvd, PB (James H Clark) - 4 pm -still tentative or, if not, 1220 S Ocean Blvd (Swanson asks $75M). BTW, Please tell Jeffrey that the Ballinger house contract was revived after a difficult due diigence period. Buyer is Richard Kurtz, a NJ real estate developer who owns garden apt complexes).

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

t 336 163 L.Ed2d 48 (2005). Whether a statute is unconstitutional as applied is also a question of law subject to de nerd review. United States v. Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218, 1225 (11th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct 368, 163 L.Ed2d 77 (2006). A. I3) Count One of the indictment cha

Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995). Telephones and cellu- lar telephones are instrumentalities of in- terstate commerce. See Pipkins, 378 KM at 1295; Ballinger, 395 F.3d at 1226. Ev- urged by Evans. Nor is there anything in the legislative history of § 1591 suggesting that Congress intended the statute to

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Sarah K Sent: Mon 10/26/2009 7:59:26 PM Subject: Saturday house hunting Begin forwarded message: From:

use of Canterbury,lnc) -3 pm- confirmed (James H Clark) - 4 pm -still tentative or, if not, (Swanson asks $75M). BTW, Please tell Jeffrey that the Ballinger house contract was revived after a difficult due dikgence period. Buyer is Richard Kurtz, a NJ real estate developer who owns garden apt complexes).