Epstein Secrets

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:19:46 +0000 I take your point. We accept the deal on your terms i

ct 2015 14:19:46 +0000 I take your point. We accept the deal on your terms if we can close right away. Best, Dan On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, jeffrey E. < > wrote: silly response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelemter

t 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter > wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers fol

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: num

y response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelemter < > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:04:47 +0000 Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if yo

t that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: better but too complex , for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 milli

t 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter < wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers fol

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: num

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:04:47 +0000 Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter <Ma Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if y=u'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we cou

t that if y=u'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close=this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 =t 7:13 PM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@=mail.com» wrote: better 4k but too complex , for ex , 400k 4 first everyone gets their money back, and th

ct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelernter < > a Dear Jeffrey - Regarding ou= conversation yesterday, we'd prop

Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeffery -- F

Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeff

From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter <Ma Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if y=u'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close=this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

t that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: better but too complex , for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 milli

14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelernter > wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Daniel Gelernter

response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter - > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 2:34 PM To: Daniel Gelernter Subject: Re: numbers follow-up if you are short of cash im h

elernter =lt <mailto > wrote: $1M investment= Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our =onversation yesterday, we'd prop

ter =lt <mailto > wrote: $1M investment= Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our =onversation yesterday, we'd prop

Lesson 1 why risk no deal fo= such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at =1:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter < wrote: <mailtc l> Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; w= could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50=, and if we could close this right away. Regards, =div>Dan On We