response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter - > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

y response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelemter < > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:04:47 +0000 Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter <Ma Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if y=u'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close=this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

Lesson 1 why risk no deal fo= such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at =1:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter < wrote: <mailtc l> Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; w= could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50=, and if we could close this right away. Regards, =div>Dan On We