Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
17 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
6 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:19:46 +0000 I take your point. We accept the deal on your terms i
ct 2015 14:19:46 +0000 I take your point. We accept the deal on your terms if we can close right away. Best, Dan On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, jeffrey E. < > wrote: silly response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelemter
t 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter > wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers fol
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: num
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:19:46 +0000 I take your point. We accept the
6 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:04:47 +0000 Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if yo
t that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: better but too complex , for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 milli
t 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter < wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers fol
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: num
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:04:47 +0000 Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we co
5 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, David Gelemter < Subject: numbers follow-up Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:55:36 +0000 Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversati
follow-up Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:55:36 +0000 Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, David Gelemter < Subjec
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, David Gelemter <
From: Daniel Gelemter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, David Gelemter < Subject: numbers follow-up Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:55:36 +0000 Dear Jeffrey - Reg
Sponsored
4 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
in investing the full $1M. We appreciate the offer but the terms don't make sense for us for $400k. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: better but too complex , for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 milli
From: Daniel Gelemter To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:14:14 +0000 Hi Jeffrey -- Just got the docs from Darren. I understood that you were interested in investing the full $1M. We appreciate the offer but the terms don't make
t 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter < wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd prop
From: Daniel Gelemter To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:14:14 +0000 Hi Jeffrey -- Just got the docs fro
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (1)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Daniel Gelemter