Epstein Secrets

A NO. 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of Action, and Motion for More Definite Statement; Motion to Strike (DE 47).

, 2009 by an Amended Complaint (DE 40). Plaintiff brings suit alleging Counts I-XXX - Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 against Defendant Epstein; Count XXXI - Sexual Battery against Defendant Epstein; and Count XXXII - Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Assault Against Defendant 1 EFTA00731326

se of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 against Defendant Epstein; Count XXXI - Sexual Battery against Defendant E

NO. 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION THIS

eed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enu

bringing about a harmful or offensive contact or apprehension thereof." McDonald v. Ford 223 So.2d 553, 555 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1969), quoting 3 Flalur., Assault and Battery, § 3. A battery consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that

02/12/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey E

ed as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. Id. This was an important element of Epstein's plan. Id. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Am. Compl. ¶ 11. Upon arrival at Defendant's mansion, the undera

0119-CIV-MARRA Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION

ringing about a harmful or offensive contact or apprehension thereof.' McDonald I. Ford, 223 So.2d 553, 555 (Fla. 2n° DCA 1969), quoting 3 Fla.Jur., Assault and Battery, § 3. Assault is defined as an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward another under suc

02/12/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey E

ed as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. Id. This was an important element of Epstein's plan. Id. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Am. Compl. ¶ 11. Upon arrival at Defendant's mansion, the undera

0119-CIV-MARRA Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION

ringing about a harmful or offensive contact or apprehension thereof.' McDonald I. Ford, 223 So.2d 553, 555 (Fla. 2n° DCA 1969), quoting 3 Fla.Jur., Assault and Battery, § 3. Assault is defined as an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward another under suc