Epstein Secrets

USAO's conduct in this case. Background I. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, inc

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutor

4/05. fold Detective Keeney that Epstein Did Not Take out Sex Toys. Epstein Pmhahlc Cause Affidavit at 14: see also Police Report (11/10/05) at 49 C'Epstein 'this statement appears nowhere in the transcript of -sworn 21.11/Als interviewed by Oacclivveice. once by telephone. and once in person. The port

without any foundation tie doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation. Mr. F.pstein's counsel explained that there could be no basis for these charges since Mr. Epstein did not commit any prerequisite act for a money laundering cha

d & Ellis LLP Joe D. Whitley Alston & Bird I.LP RFP MIA 000477 EFTA00208958 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Dep

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutors

ded to review some of the issues and concerns of Mr. Epstein's defense team. Importantly. I appreciate your ag

xed that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. So J. Lelkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

ROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003302 EFTA00157684 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

ring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typic

here, those problems unquestionably present multi jurisdictional obstacles that States and localities cannot confront effectively on their own. Mr. Epstcin's conduct was purely local in nature, and the State of Florida and Palm Beach County are effectively prosecuting and punishing that conduct. Althou

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

dent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both nertcruy and warranted in view of the le

asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. o . Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecut

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from.. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . . ." The letter then w

egal-eeunsel-fer-vietint-perssing-eleints-against-Epsteinl-hy GAB-021MEMOVirNevember-28r 209-7r 1-wid-atith

date-when-a-reselatien-was-aehieved, Relando-is-eallingr but-Relande-knews-net-te-tell-Chief-Reiter-abeut-the-meney issuer -just-about-what-efimes-Mrr Epstein-is-pleading-guiltrto-and-the-ameum-ef time-that-h-as-been-agr-eed-te,Rekmale-aise-is-telling-Chief-Reifer-hvi-fe-diseiese the-euteemete-anyene LI7

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

I") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants

tifieatien-Letter, You-wfite-that-you-denit-understand-the-basis-fer-the-Offieels-belief--that-it-is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of 2001," fanother-name-frent-the-GV-11.41-mime-ktimims-are-entitled-te e-right-to masenabler aeeurater and-timely-netiee-of-any-publie-emmt-pmee

l prosecutorial authority. IO 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001653 EFTA00209832 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depart

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United St

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

ey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clint

sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug

ida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 N.E. '0 Street Miami. FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: November 30, 2007 I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding

ber 15th, Rolando Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another matter, and was told by Mr. Krisher that he had just spoken with Jack Goldberger, and Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing were set to occur on December 14, 2007. Since that time, we have tried to confirm the date and time of the hearing, to includ

53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 N.E. '0 Street Miami. FL

that he had just spoken with Jack Goldberger, and Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing were set to occur on Decem

the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Allow me to explain our legal obligations. In 2004, Congress enacted the "Justice for All Act of 2004." Section 102 of that Act amended Title 18 by adding Section 3771, entitled "Crime victims' rights." Those rights include: "The right to re