Epstein Secrets

(14416 1 P R/1 SOA(16 EFTA00228253 Pagel of 48 ACCOUNT NUMBER PAYMENT DUE DATE NEW BALANCE MINIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsimile Copy Chair: Gold MasterCard❑ ACCOUNT NUMBER: NEW BALAN

INIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4T

r.-. JE FFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE CAD J EPSTEIN CO 4TH Fl. NEW YORK NY 100224843 CHASE Facsími

livarer•••••• fatlaeal Data flee 929 WI 211441 Tin Outs 0.1 010.4144 401114,144 s470.•41414 4•01110 017114 MARIS MIA ROLM •Cia, Pilme.01coari. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN ai Ulialetl YtP1r i a A1100,4482 PA, 213114 mad 11• Void Void Void Void Void. 480,WICIFF0084.1441.4131110AL VA/1044144111048111141014011118 fl YMO

M a Nen ESEnce ..,,,,.E a. Ofs $10 ao S000 (*ISO! SI* 43 Mann Endes. --Sad WI 0 `... 0. 4 ,a' 1/4.1. Mot ea • •••••• EN. <4, K. Pro Ess IMO JE ETA* 00 .1 MECO 014 FL WM VOW NY TOCOMMI 1...1111-11 ..... CHASE 0 CMOIADASEP SERVICE PO SOX 15 113 WHIANOTOIE Cf illebSSIS3 Cavan/ DA, 0.

32.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsi

concluded that officers must "conduct the search in a way that avoids searching files of types not identified in the warrant." IL Based on Carey and Walser, it is quite clear that the Tenth Circuit considers a file to be the appropriate quantum of seizure in search warrants for records.' This file-bas

G WITH YOU AND 1112 ATIVR.NEYS FOR YOUR ROER. DI EPSTEINS RAPE AND SEX TRAFFICKING EMPIRE ITIAT SPANNED DEC

s. IISSO&SIMIL ods Rity Ii. 16. 26x•'-iosai siSo-toidsioasil one"' Sispecasoiopssolst-iots-coreads ▪ /DFC- Ncido/sysrmiot sse: kosisk tom: ospowi, JE rnrrLn.kmm ON Sit ryty 14. 16. 2brooride siSe- TaDRIoolit one' SHISIesdro<I-SRS, RRY--- dir-1slar-ir • siSe-"testokssaicat nowi ha loosail. sos. ato

TE:Sam -p AND Kit RIDES DELIBERATELY GOADING ME WITH YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WIN DAI ARE NOT FIT TO BE PRESIDENT OF 111EUNITED STATES Or AMERICA. JEFFREY EPSIIIN AND °DISEASE MAXWELL AN1) OMENS (RED TOGO THAT TO ME WHEN EPSTEIN WAS DELIBERATELY STARVING MEIN.. YOURSELF. AREA DANGER TO THE ASIERICAN PEOPLE. ES

TO BE PRESIDENT OF 111EUNITED STATES Or AMERICA. JEFFREY EPSIIIN AND °DISEASE MAXWELL AN1) OMENS (RED TOGO

• Ist-f-lrusliaran Fri. DR 27. Zar 14:10. brYrablib `Pore- (Rbickibcapoe-'cor- clas--gyeernitail gom', ray Or-rbeeor, %TUE BILDERRERG MF-M(3(RO' ( EPSYEIN RWIROBATES!,krbip. rabv., rav Or-rbeeor, cbrb rabv., cov -.ac, Be aRedful Rul Ibseny MUS biml peu* du( >bu ice lure R amber In ‚br. robv., <Ry (I

r det Fost. irp KN frem 1013 me "Slet a ReArd SIRI MAO from DE I .N11` YENNLI. ?Kr IPS ?MADE BY IP NIORBAN AND ALL BANKS INADLVED dinterEWILL BO TO EPSILIN YIC TIM& ILDER FAMILIES. THE HOISGA(S. 'MEIR ramiues ALL THE DINCOCENT ClYILIAND WHO LOSE LCWED aNES BY IIAMMAS AND TO IIIE FREE SEATEOF PALASTINETO

-eilo->Even Mkt RoMT MI Meads:so »make ~If a Octal. THEN TOLD ME TO CEI OYERAnbirdcbs <dim crilte dm'auio*.• <tm <dim crilte dtr-mo'b Reed Me Walser.° Alan! Tbu an mid bT • »ebb MIP$ dal MIT TIM 0$$ObenDMMIT <dim crelte dtr'bolo'b <br <db> <dn. thr-Smot$ llort h a' ims date 'netball, <cdim

eement of the parties. that appearance was rescheduled for July 17, 2007. The day before that scheduled appearance, i.e.. July 16. 2007. counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, who seeks to intervene in this matter, was informed by Deputy Chief that Riley did not have to appear physically before the grand jury if a motio

nformed by Deputy Chief that Riley did not have to appear physically before the grand jury if a motion to quash the subpoena at issue was filed by Epstein before the end of the day on July 17. 2007. As the Government's Response states. Epstein's motion to quash was filed on July 17, 2007 before the clo

he Response of the United States to the Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Sub

d jury subpoenas to investigator and his firm, Mr. Epstein is represented by undersigned counsel Roy Black.

puter-related. searches can raise difficult Fourth Amendment issues different from those encountered when searching paper files"); United States v. Walser, 275 F.3d 981, 986 (10th Cir. 2001) ("[b]ecause computers can hold so much information touching on many different areas of a person's life, there is