Epstein Secrets

EFTA00222039 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 3 of 11 Jane Doe No. 2 1. Epstein Page 3 DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Interrogatory No. 1. Identify all employees who performed work of servi

HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DOCKET 912.6109 DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys,

STEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DOCKET 912.6109 DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED F

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DOCKET 912.610

culated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In addition, such information is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed. Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evid. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Interrogat

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, i

ly, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this Motion to Compel Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, for follow-up deposition. Accordingly, EPST

CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120

ry deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) and Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.280. 10. As defined by §90.401, Fla.Evid.Code, "relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact." "Relevancy describes evidence that has a legitimate tendency to

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, i

ly, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this Motion to Compel Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, for follow-up deposition. Accordingly, EPST

CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120

ry deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) and Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.280. 10. As defined by §90.401, Fla.Evid.Code, "relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact." "Relevancy describes evidence that has a legitimate tendency to