Epstein Secrets

Motion To Identify Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys and

IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. , Motion For Protective Order And Alternative Motion To Ide

ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. , Motion For Protective Order And Alternative Motion To Identify Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("M

laintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Es

CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Mo

on of discovered information before trial is not the kind of classic prior restraint that requires exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(any order restraining press access must consider less restrictive alternatives including, but not limited

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMEN

EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Amended Motion for a Pr

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1

n the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cl

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMEN

EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Amended Motion for a Pr

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1

n the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cl

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat