Epstein Secrets

ta Established: 05/072007 Nbr. Of OffteS/BianCINM: 1 NW. Of Ern6loyesS: 1 migaine Adverawneme O Current Client 00ther Contact Person Name & Title JEFFREY E EPSTEIN-PRESIDENT CakedPersonTekponea- 2. Aee.untT •e O Sole Proprietorship D Parewship O Cornoration ONOn-Prait O LLP OLLC O Other COM O CcrTnerPai Checkin

tion of risk for tie owner end can Nov th owns inn and control of a number of Shunt companies. Most of the other companies are and or founded by Mr. Epstein. l':'. Sigeheageb7811031Vata4S.832044/83Aartvii9EVEMPAWtres . UN • il 13. Address of visited nation. 8100 Red Hook Quarter STe 83 is. loadion

COM Dot 054212007 HOME= WORK: / /,/ Neue: JEFFREY E 81,87E ID TWO: No. ID Type: LC Na TA200418 t

728 EFTA01268932 MONA WPC FT REAL ESTATE, INC. ACCOult nano. Bin Rog 1 Da 01/08/08 Messy 8100 Red Hook Queue B3 St Thomas Now Work Name: JEFFREY E N SSN: ID Type: MI 1401T-4200411933 A Name: D IND SSN. ID 759e:US No: Passport Y SELLER SSN: ID Type:Nita' No: Neme: / -Ge SSN: ID Typ

Most of the other companies are and or founded by Mr. Epstein. l':'. Sigeheageb7811031Vata4S.832044/83Aartvii

orattan. If Conatee Svudare uses bearer shares' da not open the soMrit), Under no ormonstences may the band* he in/madded Ina Monad haven may. See Treace of Teen Contras. • CantoaV Plan* Dearead O Shack vnt the an of baness and compete tre 'Obserratone el the Ma Of Sabine form. This must be done w

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c)( I). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff Jane Doe has failed to carry her burden of showing that anything on the Epstein interview tape sought through the subpoenas challenged here may be compelled from movants under either the reporter's privilege recognized in this

prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein." Edwards then cites a deposition transcript, without providing the relevant pages, "wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News." Offering this as a "criminal event," Edwards states that, "[

on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for Jane. Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE

on that any of those people . . . have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victi

in the Daily News. Even as to published quotes, a privilege still applies, although the level of protection may be diminished. See United States v. Treace, 603 F. Supp. 2d 670, 672 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (appeal pending) (requiring testimony of reporter to confirm published quotes but limited inquiry by the d

ve Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c)( I). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff has failed to carry her burden of showing that anything on the Epstein interview tape sought through the subpoenas challenged here may be compelled from movants under either the reporter's privilege recognized in this

prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein." Edwards then cites a deposition transcript, without providing the relevant pages, "wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News." Offering this as a "criminal event," Edwards states that, "[

found on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for ME v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE

on that any of those people . . . have spoken to Mr. Epstein about or any of the other specific victims," Edw

in the Daily News. Even as to published quotes, a privilege still applies, although the level of protection may be diminished. See United States v. Treace, 603 F. Supp. 2d 670, 672 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (appeal pending) (requiring testimony of reporter to confirm published quotes but limited inquiry by the d