Epstein Secrets

TE LAND OFFICE, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, HEREINAFTER CALLED "LESSOR" AND: ZORRO TRUST HEREINAFTER CALLED "LESSEE(S)", WHOSE ADDRESS OF RECORD IS: C/O JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK,NY 10022 LESSOR AND LESSEE AGREE AND COVENANT AS FOLLOWS: 1. LEASE. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF AND SUBJECT TO THE RENT

nds.org September 18, 2006 Re: State Agricultural Leases No. GR-2088 & GR-2122 (Sublease No. GR-2088-000I) & (Sublease No. GR-2122-OOO1) Dear Mr. Epstein: Please find enclosed a copy of your approved sublease application. Your sublease will commence on October 1, 2006 and will expire on September 30

te of gew Mexico Commissioner ofPubfic Lands 310 OLD SANTA FE TRAIL P.O. BOX 1148 SANTA FE. NEW MEXICO 87SO4-I tdR May 8, 2006 Zorro Trust C/O Jeffery E. Epstein 457 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10022 Re: State Agricultural Lease No. GR-2088 (Sublease No. GR-2088-0001) Dear Lessee(s): COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE

LED "LESSEE(S)", WHOSE ADDRESS OF RECORD IS: C/O JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK,NY 10022 LES

LED "LESSEE(S)", WHOSE ADDRESS OF RECORD IS: C/O JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK,NY 10022 LESS

GR-2088-000I) & (Sublease No. GR-2122-OOO1) Dear Mr. Epstein: Please find enclosed a copy of your approved su

52 February 14, 1997 Ublivion Enterprises VO Skip Whitson P.O. Box 5588 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-5511 Re: Sealed Bid on Open-Acreage Dear Mr. Whitson: Recently, I wrote you to inform you that you did not win the competitive bid. I neglected to enclose your rejected application with that letter.

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c)( I). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff Jane Doe has failed to carry her burden of showing that anything on the Epstein interview tape sought through the subpoenas challenged here may be compelled from movants under either the reporter's privilege recognized in this

prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein." Edwards then cites a deposition transcript, without providing the relevant pages, "wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News." Offering this as a "criminal event," Edwards states that, "[

on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for Jane. Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE

on that any of those people . . . have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victi

m Products Antitrust Litig., 680 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1982) (per curiam) 18 Lee v. Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n No. 08-22111-CIV, 2009 WL 506

ve Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c)( I). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff has failed to carry her burden of showing that anything on the Epstein interview tape sought through the subpoenas challenged here may be compelled from movants under either the reporter's privilege recognized in this

prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein." Edwards then cites a deposition transcript, without providing the relevant pages, "wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News." Offering this as a "criminal event," Edwards states that, "[

found on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for ME v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE

on that any of those people . . . have spoken to Mr. Epstein about or any of the other specific victims," Edw

m Products Antitrust Litig., 680 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1982) (per curiam) 18 Lee v. Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n No. 08-22111-CIV, 2009 WL 506