Epstein Secrets

From: Larry Visoski To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Thu,

From: Larry Visoski To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:46:08 +0000 Jeffrey Thank you for the wedding congrats„ all going great„ Brice, Karen and the Zorro team have been amazing„ I spoke to Bob today„ He informed Royal J

Jeffrey Thank you for the wedding congrats„ all going great„ Brice, Karen and the Zorro team have been amazing„ I spoke to Bob today„ He informed Royal Jet of our Friday deadline,. Bob informs they have a signed completed LOI„ he doesn't think a deposit has been confirmed„ Bob said, Mid Next week is de

19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Bob Jeffrey, just completed my hours long phone conversation

completed my hours long phone conversation with Bob,. *** I told him to re-engage the $16M offer and 5 day timeline, Quick close, he informs again, Royal Jet was insulted by the offer, and indicated we offered $17M in Dec of 2016,. I told Bob, the BBJ surely didn't appreciate during this time, and we are

te during this time, and we are a Quick close offer at this time,. he liked my opinion regarding the offer. Before Ramadan this month, Bob informed Royal Jet utilized that BBJ on Big dollar charter work,. now the Charters are slow again, and appears Royal is more interested in Bob presenting our offer.,

"less might by the aircraft but it certainly won'= go for much less than 16.5-16.7 . I can almost guarantee that statement wi=hout reservation . Mr. Epstein also mentioned that no matter what aircraft h= bought , he wanted to redo the interior to reflect his taste. Therefor may=e the Royal Jet aircraft

ou please pass the following communique along to Mr. Epstein= Thank-you in advance for your Offer to P=rchase

DEAL "on a BBJ w=s that of Royal Jet S/N 30884 YG-038, and at 17.0 million there was n=thing in the market to compete. In my last conversation with Royal Jet, I b=lieve something a "Little "less might by the aircraft but it certainly won'= go for much less than 16.5-16.7 . I can almost guarantee that stat

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Larry Visoski Subje

12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Larry Visoski <la> wrote: Jeffrey Darren should request engine specs for the origi

national (Etihad Engineering) which is an MRO approved by both GCAA and FAA, or within UAE as long as it is an FAA/GCAA approved facility audited by Royal Jet. 5. Royal Jet will be responsible for any discrepancies with the agreed cap of 500,000 above which Royal Jet can either elect to pay for the discr

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Larry Visoski Subje

esday, 12 October 2016, Larry Visoski <a wrote: Jeffrey Darren should request engine specs for the origi

national (Etihad Engineering) which is an MRO approved by both GCAA and FAA, or within UAE as long as it is an FAA/GCAA approved facility audited by Royal Jet. 5. Royal Jet will be responsible for any discrepancies with the agreed cap of 500,000 above which Royal Jet can either elect to pay for the discr

o.com < <1=> </a </a </a P: From: Lvjet Sent: 15 May 2017 13:24 To: Robert Peerless Subject: Re: Royal Jet BID Bob, www.opusaero.com> Mr. Epstein is happy to enter=into an agreement with you, your interests need to be aligned, h= doesn't want to get a better price and pay you less of a commiss

ject: Re: Royal Jet BID Bob, www.opusaero.com> Mr. Epstein is happy to enter=into an agreement with you, you

a successful transaction in order to be paid. I would also need to see the original L.O=1. containing all of the terms and conditions discussed with Royal Jet , I=st time around. I have some very strong connections with Royal Jet and I f=el confident that I could add a lot to the deal. off for the next 2

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:11 PM To: Matt Brown Subject: Re: BBJ information please see my review in pdf attached

you wanted us =o note during the discussion today: - Intermix of Engines resulting in di=ferent hours is due to the engine stagger program of Royal Jet fleet. Howe=er both engines are far away from overhaul as the first removal LLP is at =0,200cycles while Engl@2,000cyc and Eng2@3,000 approx. so yo

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 10:55 AM To: . Subject: send to bob Dear Darren, Further t= the emails below, we have now

aminations of the engines are now excluded from the main pre-purchase inspection given they will already have been carried out. 4. 4, Section 3(e): Royal Jet will permit further flight tests to be carried out, but if they are not necessary as per manufacturer's maintenance manual for release to service th

9, 2017 6:01 PM To: Je vacation Subject: Bob Jeffrey Bob just called me„ He informs Royal Jet may no

From: Larry Visoski Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 6:01 PM To: Je vacation Subject: Bob Jeffrey Bob just called me„ He informs Royal Jet may not take the BBJ to Ebace show in Geneva„ Bobs plan was to make an offer once the airplane arrived in Geneva,., Bob has informed Royal jet that

From: Larry Visoski Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 10:30 PM To: Je vacation Subject: Bob Peerless Jeffrey Just spoke to Bob Peerless,. 48min call., To condense, Bob spoke to Rob, the President of Royal Jet, Bob informs Royal Jet is not h=ppy with us,. A

0:30 PM To: Je vacation Subject: Bob Peerless Jeffrey Just spoke to Bob Peerless,. 48min call., To condense, Bob spoke to Rob, the President of Royal Jet, Bob informs Royal Jet is not h=ppy with us,. And doesn't want to deal with us, however as a typical, Bob t=inks if he is hired by us to represent