Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
12 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
5 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ent 477 Entered on FLSD Docket 0226;2010 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
HE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2010 (DE 462), WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Reconsideration and/or for Request Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of
n this regard and/or providing self-incriminating information is substantial, real and not merely imaginative. Third Party Privacy Rights And Judge Jeffrey's Colbath's Order The Magistrate's Order does not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows full well, attached to
n fact and opinion attorney work product of both Mr. Epstein's attorneys and government attorneys. Particular
196, 205, 207 (1995)(puipose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence ¶410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
5 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ent 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARR A/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
4, 2010 (DE 462), (DE 480) AND APRIL 1, 2010 (DE 513), WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Consolidated Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of the Magistrate's Orders (DE 462)
o. 19 Beach State Attorney and the USAO may not want to disclose their files for one reason or another. (ii) Third Party Privacy Rights And Judge Jeffrey's Colbath's Order The Magistrate's Order does not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NPA is
n fact and opinion attorney work product of both Mr. Epstein's attorneys and government attorneys. Particular
196, 205, 207 (1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005X"The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is t
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d therefore insulates the particular parties to a settlement discussion FRE 410(4) is particularly directed to communications in matters which, like Epstein's, did not result in a plea of guilty to ni t federal charge. Fla. Stat. §90.410 provides parallel protections in state criminal matters. Epstein p
n fact and opinion attorney work product of both Mr. Epstein's attorneys and government attorneys. Particular
(1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a EFTA00729521 privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d therefore insulates the particular parties to a settlement discussion FRE 410(4) is particularly directed to communications in matters which, like Epstein's, did not result in a plea of guilty to ni t federal charge. Fla. Stat. §90.410 provides parallel protections in state criminal matters. Epstein p
n fact and opinion attorney work product of both Mr. Epstein's attorneys and government attorneys. Particular
(1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a EFTA00586218 privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and J. Weinstein & M. Berger
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON5,935 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
George W. Bush
PERSON5,075 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4,821 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
United States
LOCATION4,786 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Harry Reid
PERSON4,188 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON3,877 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON3,169 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON2,740 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON2,566 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
the Southern District
LOCATION2,140 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Paul Cassell
PERSON2,045 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Justin Trudeau
PERSON2,009 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Samantha Power
PERSON1,890 w/ Jeffrey·4 w/ J.
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON1,517 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Bradley Cooper
PERSON1,436 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON1,425 w/ Jeffrey·4 w/ J.
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON1,137 w/ Jeffrey·4 w/ J.
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON891 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON771 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON670 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ J.