Epstein Secrets

vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN The undersigned, Jeffrey E. Epstein, having first been duly sworn, hereby deposes and says: 1. I am over eighteen (18) years old and have personal knowledge of the facts stated here

or leave to file the supplemental argument contained herein on the following grounds: 1. The trial judge entered summary final judgment in favor of Epstein on the ground that the litigation privilege bars the malicious prosecution and abuse of process claims filed against Epstein by the appellant, Brad

unrelated to the underlying litigation against me, and (b) asserting my causes of action against Edwards and Rothstein in the Action. FURTHER AFFI JEFFREY EPS STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) _ - Sworn and subscribed to before me, the undersigned authority, by Jeffrey Epstein, this 25t

e of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered $200,000,000.00 for settle

. 4D14-2282 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Appellee. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUP

n by the defendant in the malicious prosecution action at the time the underlying action was initiated, not some later point in time."). In Yurko, the Fifth District concluded: "The affidavit here shows Yurko reasonably researched and investigated his case, and had a tenable theory to present to the court and ju

TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 3 4 E.W., ) 5 ) Plaintiff, ) 6 ) vs )Case No. 502008CA028058 7 )XXXXMB AD JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) 8 ) Defendant. ) 9 X 10 11 PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE 12 HONORABLE JUDGE DONALD W. HAFELE 13 14 15 May 22, 2009 8:30 a.m. - 9:30 a.m

nsual 17 sexual partners since the age of 10 of our 18 clients. 19 Now, going to the point about the timing 20 of the deposition, we took Mr. Epstein's 21 deposition on April 30th, a month ago. We got 22 approximately 153 refusals to answer in 155 23 pages of questions. 24 Let me back up a

er to see them through rose colored 6 glasses. 7 I would say one of the best examples is 8 statement. She basically says, "You 9 know, I love Jeffrey, he was good to us. I told 10 every girl I brought, including , you have 11 to do a topless massage and maybe the more you 12 do, the more mon

about the timing 20 of the deposition, we took Mr. Epstein's 21 deposition on April 30th, a month ago. We

rest that both sides receive, as I mentioned earlier, a fair consideration of their case. I do temper my comments today with the understanding as the Fifth District in the Ballast case made clear, that discovery is far EFTA00776416 52 1 broader than admissibility. I'm not suggesting 2 at this juncture tha

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs. RESPONSE IN

in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion for Fees and Costs, and as grounds therefor would state: INTRODUCTION This case arises from Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards, when Epstein sued Edwards merely for his legal representation of people accusing Epstein of misconduct. Edwards counter-

COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOT

differential. Under section 768.79, you offer an "amount," not a deal. You can't apply mathematics to "non-monetary offers." As a later panel of the Fifth District noted, "One might logically posit, in fact, that 'the only enforceable non-monetary condition allowable under the rule is one that does not go beyon