Epstein Secrets

HE COURT: Let's go ahead and proceed with the substance of the motion and we will go from there, please. MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: Good morning, Judge. Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment is based on a very simple issue that was not addressed by this Court in a Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We have various motions on the Edwards counterclaim that was brought against Mr. Epstein relative to the remaining count of malicious prosecution. I have read as much as the materials that someone can sit down and read for the better

id, I would like to begin with Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein's motion for summary judgment on Defendant/ Cou

H COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

he Edwards counterclaim that was brought against Mr. Epstein relative to the remaining count of malicious pro

S. Australian Avenue, Suite 33401 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A., ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 By TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Av

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND SUPPORTINGMEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, by and

UCTION Edwards's Motion to Strike is based solely upon his erroneous argument that this Court's consideration of the probable cause issue raised in Epstein's Motion for Summary Tonga Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fon Lauderdale, FL 33301. EFTA00808559 Judgment is batted by the law of the case doc

IRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BRADL

or judicial proceeding . . ."). Accordingly, Edwards's Motion to Strike should be denied on the grounds of both the law of the case and estoppel. B. Epstein Did Not "Actually Present" to the Fourth District Court of Appeal the Issue of Probable Cause The positions Edwards now takes in his Motion to Stri

33301 • .. lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad, Es 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale,

009CAO40B00/COM 1 4 THE COURT: Announce your appearances for the Court, MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley Edwards, Your Honor. 3 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, MR. BREWER: Chester Brewer on behalf Plaintiff, of Jeffrey Epstein. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individbally, BRADLEY SWARDS, individually, MS. HADDAD: T

Epstein: e There Is also a motion directed to 8 K. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 33401 striking the affidavit of Mr. Epstein filed 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 :o in support of the motion. By W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A., ESQUIRE 21 THE COURT: You had mentioned that t

:2,6,17 hopefully 5:4 I include 4:5 includes 4:16 individually 1:8,8 intend 5:4 intended 4:22 interrupted 3:17 issues 4:16 J Jack 2:6 3:3 Jeffrey 1:5 2:7,11 3:6.8 JR 2:8,9 Judge 1:16 judgment 3:22 4:4 4:7.15 JUDICIAL 1:1 jurisdiction 5:14.20 K know 3:16 5:22 L Lakes 1:22 2:5 laryngi

an Avenue, Suite 33401 striking the affidavit of Mr. Epstein filed 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 :o in suppo

.A., ESQUIRE 21 THE COURT: You had mentioned that to 10 22 me. 11 For Jeffrey EpeteLn: 12 TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 19 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 14 And, obviously, our response to the 13 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 motion for sumnary judgment, as wall, which By TONJA HADDAD

rivilege is very clearly defined in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3). And, Your Honor, that is quoted in the response in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to overrule objections and compel answers to these questions. It is quoted in its entirety at page two of our response. And it says that a

urt is aware, the only thing pending at this point in time in the case is Mr. Edwards' claim of abuse of process malicious prosecution against Mr. Epstein. The abuse of process claim has been disposed of. It was successfully won on the summary judgment and is no longer an issue. So the only operativ

H COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

f abuse of process malicious prosecution against Mr. Epstein. The abuse of process claim has been disposed o

S. Australian Avenue, Suite 33401 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A., ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 By TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Av

Courtroom 9C West Palm Beach, FL 33401 The Honorable Donald W. Hafele Motion for a Specially-Set Hearing (1 hour) on Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment Counsel certifies that a bona fide effort to agree to narrow the issues on the Motion(s) noticed has been made with op

VISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHST

CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT

Esq. Haddad & Navarro, PLLC I Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale FL 33394 E-Mails: Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 E-Mails: EFTA00601681