Epstein Secrets

ichard Barnett. The affidavit stated: 'On Wednesday, October 13, 2010, an unmarked and unpostrnarked envelope was discovered in the mailbox at Mr. E[psitein's vacation home in New York City at 9 East 7181 Street. The envelope contained a Summons and Complaint in the subject action, a Civil Rico Case S

ncluding an Order that Epstein is in default for failing to timely answer the complaint. Plaintiff M.J. was repeatedly sexually abused by defendant Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor. Epstein is a politically-connected billionaire. M.J. filed suit in this Court against Epstein, seeking substantial damages. A

attan that was formerly owned by Les Wexner. a villa in Palm Beach, Florida, and a fortress on a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Wikipedia entry for Jeffrey Edward Epstein (visited on Oct. 30, 2010). Accordingly, it may be difficult to identify a single "dwelling" for Epstein. 3 The Court was referring to an earlier v

for a hearing to demonstrate fraud, to prove the defendant Epstein was properly served, to obtain sanctions for his

M.J. was repeatedly sexually abused by defendant Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor. Epstein is a polit

is a document which purports to be a return of service."). In his motion to quash, Epstein concedes the materials were left at his °vacation home.° Barnett Aff. at 1. Epstein's New York Mansion is well known for being the largest private residence in Manhattan and for being owned by Epstein. Given Marsigli

07/25:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Clerk to Enter

JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL CLER

V-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COM

sides at Defendant's New York home. Mr. Barnett submitted an affidavit sworn under penalty of perjury that he does not reside at that address. (See Barnett Aff.) Plaintiff has not submitted any evidence to suggest that Mr. Barnett is not credible, so allowing discovery on this point would simply be a waste

07/25/2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER VACATING ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte. On July 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order (DE 26) den

JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER VACATING ENTRY OF DEFAULT TH

V-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER VACATING ENTRY OF DEF

esides at Defendant's New York home. Mr. Bamett submitted an affidavit sworn under penalty of perjury that he does not reside at that address. (See Barnett Aff.) Plaintiff has not submitted any evidence to suggest that Mr. Barnett is not credible, so allowing discovery on this point would simply be a waste