Epstein Secrets

an appeal brought by defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant Epstein challenges the designation that he was given unde

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, —against— JEFFREY E. EPsTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS R

individuals who were identified as victims 9 of Mr. Epstein's conduct, and Judge Marra's 10 order says that

ly 23, 2006 v -v• le a eLgo.b•J 14. 01 UJJ ...EPSTEIN, JEFFREY ALIAS PLUME OVER tunics. O JACKET ft:

June 30, 2008 A35 Palm Beach Sheriffs Offiee-Beeking-Gard-for-Jeffrey--Epstein dated June 30, 2008 A47 EFTA00231444 ii PAGE Order Granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2009 A48 Letter from Florida Department of Corrections Regarding Termination of Supervision, dated July 2

, P.C. S Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND t ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Neal -4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00231448 A3 Appellant's Notice of Appeal, dated February 9, 2011 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPL

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, —against— JEFFREY E. EPsTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS

aves messages. Sgt . entered the room and explained to that based on her own statements, she had implicated herself by bringing underage girls to Epstem's house. provided cellular telephone numbers for the girls she had mentioned previously. Additionally, she also provided possible addresses and are

ssage table with a sheet on it. Epstein entered through a door and exited wearing only a towel. informed. that they were oing to provide a massage on Epstein N asked why were they doing this instead of modeling lingerie, explained to. that this was his routine and to rub his calves and feet. Epstein had t

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

-erifieitl-distirtetion-between-the-Fleridit-seature-te whieh-Mfr E-peteiri-pleeelerl-guitty-arki-the-Neve-Yerk-eegaater it-is-riet-even-elear-that-Mfr Epstein committed an offense which is registerable under Ncw York law. While the Florida law critninalistes-parronithig-a-prostitute-who-is-uridethe-itge-el

spite his Florida conviction and the conduct alleged in connection therewith. See Letter of Regina Chacon, New Mexico Department of Public Safety to Jeffery E. Epstein, August 19, 2010 (Exhibit E); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). Notwithstanding the Sstate's determination that he need not register, Mr. Epstein v

onviction for a prostitution-related offense, committed in Florida (wherehe-alse-ewris-a-vaeatien-heine)-dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida under an Information to the charge of Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostituti

indeed, by the terms of the SORA statute itself, should not be required to register. See Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a)(i).7 Indeed, nothing about Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein's interactions with A.D. -- other than A.D.'s age, which she concealed from him and has not been established to be under the age of consent under New

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

en-heine)-dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beac

ld needlessly duplicate -- and indeed, unnecessarily go well beyond -- the efforts of jurisdictions having much greater contact with and control over Jeffrer . Mr. Epstein. In addition, designating Jeffrey Mr. Epstein as a Level 3 offender would require him to return to New York to re-register every 90

& ELLIS LLP demonstrated a commitment to go beyond what is demanded of him to remain in full compliance with the law. Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that even remotely suggesting

ted June 30, 2008 A35 Palm Beach Sheriffs-Office Booking-Card-for Jeffrey Epstein, dated June 30, 2008 A47 EFTA00232564 PAGE Order Granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2009 A48 Letter from Florida Department of Corrections Regarding Termination of Supervision, dated July 2

Palm Beach Police Department Agency ORIN FLO 500600 . table, straddling Epstein to massage his back. While doing this her buttocks were touching Epsteins. ' was instructed to return to the ground at which time Epstein turned to have his chest rubbed. " I advised she was sure he was masturbating ba

P.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, 111.1611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00232568 A3 Appellant's Notice of Appeal, dated February 9, 2011 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPL

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APP

in in the kitchen of the house. She was also introduced to a white female known to her as She was led upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's bedroom. > arranged the massage table and covered the table with a sheet. She brought out the massage oils and ler ern next to the massage bed. t

an appeal brought by defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant Epstein challenges the designation that he was given unde

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APPE

ert Critton and Jack 17 Goldberger on behalf of Mr. Epstein as well 18 as Barbara Compiani from the office

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

ureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Matthew Solum Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et aL is intended to impose

lorida but owns a vacation home in Manhattan, and who has never before been convicted of a crime, clearly belongs in this latter category. Given Mr. Epstein's history and personal characteristics, the circumstances of the offense which triggered the registration requirement, his acceptance of responsibi

echoed in the words of the clinical psychologist who has worked with Mr. Epstein following his arrest/conviction for the instant offense [when did JE begin with therapy?]. That doctor, Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D., has praised Mr. Epstein's cooperativeness, self-reflection, and receptiveness to t

October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

e, clearly belongs in this latter category. Given Mr. Epstein's history and personal characteristics, the circ

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

spite his Florida conviction and the conduct alleged in connection therewith. See Letter of Regina Chacon, New Mexico Department of Public Safety to Jeffery E. Epstein, August 19, 2010 (Exhibit E); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). Notwithstanding the state's determination that he need not register, Mr. Epstein vo

conviction for a prostitution-related offense committed in Florida (where he also owns a vacation home) dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida under an Information to the charge of Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostituti

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

ion home) dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beac

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

k Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 8, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Jeffrey Epstein, a 57-year old financial advisor and philanthropist who maintains his primary res

2005. His duty to register in New York is solely by virtue of the fact that one of several vacation homes that he owns is located in Manhattan. Mr. Epstein has already registered as a sex offender in his home jurisdiction of the U.S, Virgin Islands, as well as in the other states where he owns secondary

October 8, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

October 8, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

tion homes that he owns is located in Manhattan. Mr. Epstein has already registered as a sex offender in his h

th to abide by the law unconditionally, and the reasoned determinations of other jurisdictions having greater contact and control over Mr. Epstein, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in New York has recommended that Mr. Epstein be categorized as a Level 3 sex offender. Such a harsh designation would subject Jeffrey Epstein to a

.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Nellii4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00231600 March 20, 2011 To whom it may concern: I served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida from 2005 through 2009.

ne: September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on leffre,y Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and

CLUSION For the reasons stated herein, Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein respectfully submits that the January 1

CLUSION For the reasons stated herein, Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein respectfully submits that the January 18

the prosecutors and agents in this case met with Mr. Epstein's attorney, Roy Black. Mr. Black is perhaps best

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne i -4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00232720 March 20, 2011 To whom it may concern: I served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida from 2005 through 2009.

ys and (ii) I no longer have access to the original documents, and as the matter is now nearly 4 years old, the precision of memory is reduced. The Epstein matter was originally presented to the Palm Beach County State Attorney. Palm Beach Police alleged that Epstein unlawfully hired underage high-schoo

OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. Index No.: 3012

OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. Index No.: 30129

the prosecutors and agents in this case met with Mr. Epstein's attorney, Roy Black. Mr. Black is perhaps best

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

a Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022-4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00181143 EFTA00181144 • , FEB 2 3 zoit AP 1.AL:3 RECORD PRESS, INC., 229 West 36th Street, N.Y. I0DIS-28828—(212) 619.4949 www.reco

r the reasons stated herein, Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein respectfully submits that the January 18, 2011 O

CLUSION For the reasons stated herein, Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein respectfully submits that the January 1

CLUSION For the reasons stated herein, Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein respectfully submits that the January 18

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

STATE OF NEW YORK BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF SEX OFFENDERS 4 TOWER PLACE ALBANY, NEW YORK 12203-3764 TO: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 9 EAST 71ST STREET NEW YORK, NY 10021 NYSID# OR BOARD ID # : OS1909 FROM: BOARD EXAMINER, STEPHEN D. WEBER RE: Board Determination and Risk Le

LACE ALBANY, NEW YORK 12203-3764 TO: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 9 EAST 71ST STREET NEW YORK, NY 10021 NYSID# O

4 TOWER PLACE ALBANY, NEW YORK 12203-3764 TO: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 9 EAST 71ST STREET NEW YORK, NY 10021

EN D. WEBER RE: Board Determination and Risk Level Recommendation DATE: 8/19/2010 Pursuant to the Nev. York State Sex Offender Registration Act, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders has reviewed your conviction in another jurisdiction and has determined that you are required to register with the New York State Sex Offender Regi