Epstein Secrets

CT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant / INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein has requested that he be permitted

likely that any meaningful settlement discussions can take place between the plaintiffs and the government without touching on remedy. Granting Mr. Epstein, through counsel, the right to participate in the settlement conference is necessary to effectuate Judge Marra's order granting Mr. Epstein's motion

ED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant / INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANC

government without touching on remedy. Granting Mr. Epstein, through counsel, the right to participate in the

al criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations 9 EFTA00211551 Case 9:08-c

ISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein has requested that he be permitted

conference to be convened in this matter. The right to participate in the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right at the remedy stage of these proceedings to advocate for why the remedy in this case—to the extent that the plain

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANC

e flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right at the remedy

of criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, ava

ting the Summary Judgment Motion (hereinafter "Motion") filed by the Petitioners in the CVRA case, 08-cv-80736-KAM, Dkt. 361. Dear Mr. Although Mr. Epstein is a limited intervenor rather than a party to the CVRA case between the Government and the Jane Does, please find several rebuttal arguments to the

se, 08-cv-80736-KAM, Dkt. 361. Dear Mr. Although Mr. Epstein is a limited intervenor rather than a party to th

tead it was the norm. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dept of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non— Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7. 2008) at note 2 avail