Epstein Secrets

d leaves messages. Sgt entered the room and explained to at based on her own statements, she had implicated herself by bringing underage girls to Epstem's ouse. provided cellular telephone numbers for the girls she had mentioned previously. Additionally, she also provided possible addresses and area

ated she had previouslzmoken with who told her she was interviewed by detectives. During a sworn taped statement, stated she knew that worked for MEpstein in Palm Beach. advised she originally had been taken to the Epstein house by , whom she met when they both attended Royal Palm Beach High School.

ey drove to the end of the street and entered a large drivewa . The entered the kitchen area of the house and met with Epstein. IN was introduced to MIEpstein. led upstairs to the main bedroom area and set up the room with a massage table and set out the oils. stated that while going up the stairs and i

artment. as identified as a potential witness/victim ou m onnation obtained during the trash pulls. urm sworn taped statemenadvised she was at Jeffrey Epstein's house one time, approximately two months ago. She was approached by a girl ho was dating a oommate, for an opportunity to make some quick money. =

filed a "Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement," in the matter of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jay Epstein, Court File No. 09-CV-80591-ICAM. "Jane Doe No. 101" was on the list provided to Mr. Epstein's attorneys of individuals whom the United States had

ekend. tated that she anda(Later identified as picked up=t her house. a ed that at that time she was driving a red pickup truck. They traveled to Epsteiin house and entered through the kitchen door. They met with the house chef and E stein's assistant ...vas introduced to Epstein while they were in th

's bedroom desk. This desk had stationary marked Jeffrey E Epstein. I located a wood colored armoire beside

in in the kitchen of the house. She was also introduced to a white female known to her as She was led upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's bedroom. arranged the massage table and covered the table with a sheet. She brought out the massage oils and laid them next to the massage bed. th

t to contact arah has since then been trying to contact her to ask about testions. I and do not provide any more information to she would notify Jeff Epstem and Sarah what was transpiring. On October4, 2005, I made telephone contact with who had left several messages for me to contact her. During the m

. "Jane Doe No. 101" was on the list provided to Mr. Epstein's attorneys of individuals whom the United States

ying to contact her to ask about the. , questions. I instructed M not to contact and do not provide any more information to as she would notify Jeff Epsteinand what was transpiring. to call her back reference the police questionin stated she inadvertently told and On October4, 2005, I made telephone con

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha

011 Pages w/cover: 4 Fax #: Direct #: Please see the attached letter, in response to your letter to Martin Weinberg of July 27, 2011, concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Thank you. Documena EFTA00180294 07/29/2011 13: 12 FAX a 002/004 Jay P. LeatowItz. P.C. To ilaiactly: jay.lefkowitzekirklend.cOm KIRKLAND &

oncerning the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

Jack 2:114:5 jackpot 32:9 jail 41:7 Jane 1:4,15,18,22 2:3,7 3:5,5,7,11 5:17 6:8,9,16 11:12 21:4 29:14 29:22 33:5 35:13 42:22 Jay 2:20 4:18 Jeffrey 1/ 37:12 jeopardize 9:15 Jeopardy 15:17 join 26:11,15 Josefsberg 2:1,2,5 3:18,20,21,23 19:7 19:7,1021:25 23:1 24:5 25:25 26:7,11 26:12,16 27:

ourt. I was• later 20 informed that it was a deposition. 21 Q. I'm going to ask you some questions now 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house 23 three years ago. Okay? 24 A. Oh-huh. 25 Q. When the police interviewed you one month Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Pal

. § 1446, this notice of removal is timely. Only defendant Epstein has been served with process. Defendants 21 Lew

ment ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha

011 Pages w/cover: 4 Fax #; Direct #: Please see the attached letter, in response to your letter to Martin Weinberg of July 27, 2011, concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Thank you. Docuracna EFTA00233051 07/28/2011 13:12 FAX el 002/004 Jay P. Lalkowdz, P.C. To Call Writer Directly: jayialkowitrakirklend.corin

Statement," in the matter of Jane Doe No. 1011 Jeffity Epstein, Court File No. 09-CV-80591-KAM. "Jane Doe No. 101" was on the list provided to Mr. Epstein's attorneys of individuals whom the United States had identified as victims, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and "Jane Doe No. 101" has elected to

r, Esq. Atteiburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P A Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the te

. "Jane Doe No. 101" was on the list provided to Mr. Epstein's attorneys of individuals whom the United States

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated that

ssis n m e ates Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and the "victim

r letter of July 27, 2011 in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

ssis n m e ates Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Thank you for your letter of July

s of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg in regards to the request by the New York District A

o-counsel Martin Weinberg in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

lafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your le

es of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

ntiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UPDATED RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffre

SPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure hereby files his amended responses to

mended responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edward's Net Worth Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein: I. What is your full name? ANSWER: Jeffrey Edward Epstein 2. How are you currently employed? EFTA00792703 ANSWER: Self-employed and Philanthropist. 3. State the amount of your current salary from and

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

.S. 479, 486 (1951); Ohio v Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001). My concern is in part derived from the continued efforts utilized by Edwards in the case of Doe v United States ("the CVRA case"). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth and Four

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UPDATED RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffre

SPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure hereby files his amended responses to

mended responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edward's Net Worth Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein: I. What is your full name? ANSWER: Jeffrey Edward Epstein 2. How are you currently employed? EFTA00792711 ANSWER: Self-employed and Philanthropist. 3. State the amount of your current salary from and

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

.S. 479, 486 (1951); Ohio v Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001). My concern is in part derived from the continued efforts utilized by Edwards in the case of Doe v United States ("the CVRA case"). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth and Four

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and

r letter of July 27, 2011 in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

lafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your le

s of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

nt United States Attorney United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg concerning the request by the New York District At

oncerning the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

venue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Thank you for your

ment ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated th