Epstein Secrets

• IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. cor.50.2929aufactigIVP111, CASE NO. • A Aq SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and .M., individu

OTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and .M., individually, Defendants. COMPL CO Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

ases and thus by using the deposition sell the cases (or a part of them) to third parties. #4S 37. Because of these facts, ROTHSTEIN claimed that Epste wanted to make certain none of these individuals would be deposed and therefoie he had offered $200,000,000.00 to settle the claims of RRA female

EPSTEIN and like other RRA clients, sought tens of millions of dollars. a. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, L.M. was insistent that "Jeffrey is an awesome man." (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it

hat the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as completely irrelevant

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be-relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their ca

EXHIBIT A EFTA00596488 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M.,

RECEIVED FOR FILING oic 0 1Mg EMIVION It PUCK COMPLAINT GlAilit QQMPTR966011 PINWIT CIVIk,P1\11algi Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

EPSTEIN and like other RRA clients, sought tens of millions of dollars. a. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, L.M. was insistent that "Jeffrey is an awesome man." (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it

hat the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as EFTA00596504 Epstein

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in settiry their ca

te that the Non-Prosecution Agreement "called for Mr. Epstein to serve eighteen months in county jail followed

able through Tide 28, United States Code, Section 2461; and the procedures outlined at Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. .1 04 , 044 Co' JEFFREY a SLOMAN ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY PAUL F. SCHWARTZ ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY JEFFRE N. KAPLAN ASSIS ANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CE D

August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree

t is necessary to correct certain inaccuracies contained in that communication. First, you state that the Non-Prosecution Agreement "called for Mr. Epstein to serve eighteen months in county jail followed by twelve months of community control." In fact, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, at 1 2 (a) and (b)

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be retied urn by the Judges of this Court In setting their cal

for the Southern District of Florida. 2. All recordings of the deposition(s) of Alfredo Rodriguez in connection with any civil suit pending against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court (or the Southern District of Florida, including transcripts, videorecordings, and audiorecordings. 3. All docum

ecution Agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. No federal charges were filed against Epstein or any of his co- conspirators. While there were a multitude of reasons for that decision, one sentiment was that federal nexus was not as strong as

Cooperating Attorney Date October 28, 2009 To Jeffrey Sloman Acting U.S. Attorney Acting First Assist

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their ca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO. vs. CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, el al Defendants. / Superseding Case Information: Court Division: Select One ) New Defendant(s) Yes No Number of New Defendants Miami Key West

NO. vs. CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, el al Defendants. / Superseding Case Informati

ICA CASE NO. vs. CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, el al Defendants. / Superseding Case I

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their cal

ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and

EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or about March 11, 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN reviewed a written telephone message prepared by one of his employees regard

was then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doc #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom. (47) On or about July 4, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5,

ave carefuily considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants. the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their cal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO. vs. CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY JEFFREY MaROSS a/k/a and Defendants. / Sugerseding Case Information: Court Division : ( Select One ) New Defendant.) Yes No Number of New Defendants

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their cal

ed States Code, Section 853. // eil-dOnfaete.• JEFFREY it SLOMAN ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY PAUL F.

ave carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in settin_g their c