Epstein Secrets

39 1 nonprosecution agreement -- 2 MS. BELOHLAVEK: They spell all that 3 out. 4 THE COURT: Mr. Epstein needs to come closer. 6 7 8 Mr. Epstein, your attorney has told me that in addition to everything, we talked about another Inducement, shall w

Stale AttorneCetIoNettoStedr3 dirrfeibleMIARERchr:Dd Prthatt-008 002 Form Circuit I (rev 8f2000) EFTA00190876 STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant • IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CASE NUMBER 502008CF009381AXXX1VIB DIVISION MCSORLEY "W"

08-80736-CV-MARRA P-0d895 EFTA00190891 • S PLEA Rd THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED Si TILEMEN1 Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Gudly Crietitto 06CF0094S4AMB stings_ eoug_j_4ster __Deptels Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 fa Person Under 18 for Prostitution 1

EFTA00190876 STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant • IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL

NAL DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND POEM" C CASE NO DIV. OBTS NUMBER STATE OF FLORIDA JEFFERY EPSTEIN 1/20/1953 DEFENDANT [ I COMMUNITY CONTROL VIOLATOR [ ] PROBATION VIOLATOR DATE OF BIRTH RACE GENDER SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER STATE OF FLO

taken in thiOlatter iirconjuqction •-•3 with and at the same time with the deposition of Y. Doe in the ci9r-case cntioned Jane r.:.i 3 1 Doe No. 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johkson, Ethited States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. As grounds therefore, Witness Y. Doc state

ars old. Y. Doe has brought a civil case against Defendant Epstein captioned Jane Doe No. 3 1. Jeffrey Epstein case

EFTA00190876 STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant • IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL

AVEK: They spell all that 3 out. 4 THE COURT: Mr. Epstein needs to come closer. 6 7 8 Mr. Epstein, you

y collected of waived). Strike oat If previously paid or represented by private ounsel (Pabtie Defender's Fns and Costs) punuant to Section 938.29. Florida Stamm and Fla. R. Crier P. 3.720(dX1 I and Local Administrative Order. (Minimum fee off 150.00 is statutorily mandated following notice of imposition and

aTREY EPSTEIN :ASES502008CF009381A1OOCMB 16. You will attend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings at least monthly, puling otherwise directed by

reduced to civil judgment. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENT: Page 8 of 8 Form Revised 03-18-08 EFTA00182127 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CASE NUMBER 502008CF009.381AXXVVIB DIVISION MCSORLEY "W" DC

EFTA00182127 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL C

n O initial Registration Sceectuted ReRegourstion O Information Updatn 0 Early/Late ReRegistrat1on Registrant Information Name. Race: DOB: a_ JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 'SSN. White (First Mode Lest Suffix) Sex: Male Tisclosure at your Social Seca Number (SSN) s mandatory pursuant to Florida law. sedans 775.21. 94

EFTA00182127 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CI

during an incident on September 16, 2009 in which Mr. Epstein came within approximately ten (10) feet of her,

Senron 938.03(1), Float States bultutcrilY mandated} 7 I 70 (Crtenind ante Ede catka by Slunktpalifini and ComitieHmeasant to Section 933.15. Florida Stamm to be paid to: I I Palm Bath County, Honda. (statutorily mandated same loftily authorized). I I the CityliimaNii age of , , Fkcida. (Statuto

aTREY EPSTEIN :ASES502008CF009381A1OOCMB 16. You will attend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings at least monthly, puling otherwise directed by

reduced to civil judgment. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENT: Page 8 of 8 Form Revised 03-18-08 EFTA01625758 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CASE NUMBER 502008CF00938 ittxxiatit DIVISION MCSORI.EY "W"

EFTA01625758 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL C

THS OF Janua AND July. Under penalty of perjury I declare the b‘ve is true and correct. Registrant Witnessed by Reporting Officer: Printed Name: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN Date: 01/092010 Printed Name: veronica • OFFICIAL DOCUMENT DO NOT DESTROY • ••••• NOTE: Your next ReRegistration month is July of 2910. ••••• Date: 01

EFTA01625758 TATE OF FLORIDA elaintiff -VS- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CI

during an incident on September 16, 2009 in which Mr. Epstein came within approximately ten (10) feet of her,

n 938.03( i) Florida Staters thratutonly mandated). 7. S 11:9 (Criminal Janke Editeatio• by Municipalities end Cou @del) pursuom to Simon 03$.15, Florida Stamm to be paid to: 1 / Palm Beach Comfy. Florida. (statuktily unedited what !malty authorized). 1 1 the City/TowriNillage of Florida (Statutorily

IL/ I I/ 4VVI II . KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AtIlLIATIM Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney Re: Jeffrey Fastein Dear Alex: vnvw.kiaklunU.CCun December 17, 2007 IL UV'S/ I IU Thank you for meeting with us on Friday, December 14. 2007. The meeting demonstr

emonstrated significant agreement un broad issues of policy. We all agree on the centrality of the principle of horizontal equality, namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more nor less favorably — than a less prominent or less wealthy detimdant accused of similar conduct. W

01 s testimony establishing each of these pivotal points are set forth below: • Consent Q: Okay. When did you meet him and who introduced you to Jeffrey? A: My girlfriend introduced me to Jeffrey.* (M• Sworn Statement at 5- 6) Q: Now you said thatMitold you that he likes massages. Did she elaborate

the principle of horizontal equality, namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more

a victim, for reasons we shall elucidate. So too, we have respectfully tequested illtunination as to the factual predicate for the applicability of Florida Stamm § 796.03. which now appears deeply problematic. We are met time and again substantively with silence. but when the veil of ignorance is only slightl