Epstein Secrets

to as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. J

A00207294 expressions of confidence in the strength of the evidence in her own case may be found at, e.g., SJ Opp 2 (Doe "has ample evidence that [Epstein] committed federal sex offenses against her"); 11 (Epstein's fraudulent concealment of assets "evidences [his] awareness that he is liable to the gi

sue EPSTEIN and like other RRA clients, sought tens of millions of dollars. a. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, was insistent that "Jeffrey is an awesome man." (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it

sh attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday,

5322) - 3 - EFTA00207296 EXHIBIT A EFTA00207297 Media Law Reporter Page 1 of Kir-:; Media Law Reporter's Source: Media Law Reporter Cases > U.S. District Courts, New York > E&J Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Services Inc., 33 Med.L.Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 33 Med.L.Rptr. 1413 EL) Gallo Winery v. Encana En

sponse to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, Jane Doe 2 expressed her clear and unequivocal desire not to be treated as a vi

as a victim of his conduct. 22. The Plaintiff is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged

did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E. 403-3 at 9. She lamented that Epstein was the subject of a criminal investigation: I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it would really be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an

e sole issue before the Circuit Court was whether defendant Epstein was entering pleas of guilty that were voluntary

elease, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding." § 3771(a)(4). The use of the term "district court" clearly indicates Congress was referring to U.S. District Courts, and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. § 3771(e)(3), and the review process in the federal courts of appeal, § 3771(d)(3), (e)(1), co

sponse to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, Jane Doe 2 expressed her clear and unequivocal desire not to be treated as a vi

as a victim of his conduct. 22. The Plaintiff is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged

did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E. 403-3 at 9. She lamented that Epstein was the subject of a criminal investigation: I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it would really be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an

e sole issue before the Circuit Court was whether defendant Epstein was entering pleas of guilty that were voluntary

elease, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding." § 3771(a)(4). The use of the term "district court" clearly indicates Congress was referring to U.S. District Courts, and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. § 3771(e)(3), and the review process in the federal courts of appeal, § 3771(d)(3), (e)(1), co

to as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. J

A00612027 expressions of confidence in the strength of the evidence in her own case may be found at, e.g., SJ Opp 2 (Doe "has ample evidence that [Epstein] committed federal sex offenses against her"); 11 (Epstein's fraudulent concealment of assets "evidences [his] awareness that he is liable to the gi

pportunity and content with their experiences: A: None of my girls ever had a problem and they'd call me. They'd beg me, you know, for us to go to Jeffrey's house because they love Jeffrey. Jeffrey is a respectful man. He really is. I mean, and he all thought we were of age always. This is what's so s

sh attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday,

5322) - 3 - EFTA00612029 EXHIBIT A EFTA00612030 Media Law Reporter Page 1 of Kir-:; Media Law Reporter's Source: Media Law Reporter Cases > U.S. District Courts, New York > E&J Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Services Inc., 33 Med.L.Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 33 Med.L.Rptr. 1413 EL) Gallo Winery v. Encana En

ffice of Professional Responsibility. Background of Investigation Operation Leap Year is a child exploitation investigation where the main target, Jeffrey Epstein, used his personal assistants and others as "recruiters" who would find high school girls, most of whom were minors, to travel to his home in Palm B

a Introduction This memorandum sets forth an allegation of a conflict of interest in connection with an ongoing investigation of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The investigation is named Operation Leap Year. As part of pre-indictment plea negotiations, the parties agreed that the victims would be allowe

t in connection with an ongoing investigation of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The investigation is named O

Florida Bar in 2005. This status is active. I also am admitted to practice in the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. APPENDIX B List of Persons with Knowledg