Epstein Secrets

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell." Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its par

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell." Specifically, the

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its pa

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, th

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its par

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its par

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its pa

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, th

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns

" individuals, by name, who have "spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the defendant's proposed protective order differs from the Government's in that it adds a sentence, in its par

defendant's demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any "public fora," and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be

litigation — criminal or otherwise — relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."' Specifically, the

otection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford. B. The Defendant's Demand that the Government Restrict Use of its Own Documents The defendant and her counsel also ask the Court to impose restrictions upon the Government in its use, through potential witnesses and their couns