Epstein Secrets

en into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're going to preserve those rights i

efendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff

OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', an

Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Teny David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard We

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

ers. Whether or not Fowler White and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under

eving that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.) • "I c

/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), moves' this Court for an in camera inspection of

liver the accompanying sealed Memorandum by November 9, 2018. Edwards was instructed to deliver a response sealed Memorandum by November 16, 2018. 2Epstein has reduced the original 47 e-mails for in camera review down to 30 e-mails. 3Farmer Jaffe agreed to produce all work-product related to closed case

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

n exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly not aligned with Edwards. This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by

/2018 12:02:53 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VI

r, and as grounds therefor states as follows: Summary At the March 8, 2018 hearing, this Court entered a blanket confidentiality order prohibiting Epstein from using or referring to, in any way, the documents contained on the Fowler White CD: As a general blanket order I would simply say that all attor

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject to this order of confidentiality

filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reservin

ves or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). 11. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives

, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or a Rothstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. 14. All emails exchanged between-any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned:

n or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means M. (I. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051X

s H. Lichtman, Esq., Berger Singerman, P.A. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 [ ] YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States Bankruptcy Court at the place, date and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY COURTROOM DATE AND TIME [ X YOU ARE COMMANDED to a

, FJW on behalf of LM states as follows: I. BACKGROUND A. The Pending Summary Judgment and Protective Order Motions As this Court is well aware, Jeffrey Epstein (a convicted sex offender) has sued one of his alleged victims, ■ as well as attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.', in Florida state court for cond

rds, Esq.', in Florida state court for conduct that allegedly occurred in the course of Edwards' representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. While an employee of the now defunct Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm and with his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil la

ctive Order Motions As this Court is well aware, Jeffrey Epstein (a convicted sex offender) has sued one o

tein was to prepare a consent order memorializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in t

S SOON AS POSSIBLE. BERGER SINGERMAN Dora Raton Fort Lomat:Sale Worn, Tallahassee hi, EFTA00616223 MAR-15-2011 TUE 05:39 PM FAX NO. P. 03/07 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH

-15-2011 TUE 05:39 PM FAX NO. P. 03/07 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,

23 MAR-15-2011 TUE 05:39 PM FAX NO. P. 03/07 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi

rotective Order as to a Subpoena issued upon him for records to be produced by March 16, 2011 and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively re

Source Document(s) 1 Source Document(s) IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL ESTATE CORP

t. LEXIS 93633, * On June 30, 2010, North Shore Real Estate Corporation ("North Shore") filed a notice of appeal from the May 26, 2010, judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of the Virgin Islands (the "Bankruptcy Division"), and the June 9, 2010, order of the Bankruptcy Division denying North Shore's mo

that you may have in relation to this letter to Jeffrey Lipman (email: [email protected]; telep

liabilities or condition of Holdings or Limited. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Payment of Deferred Consideration Pursuant to the Proof of Claim filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January 11, 2008, Limited has filed a proof of claim in respect of contingent, unliquidated claims (if any) (collec

s process. Execution copies should be returned to Jeffrey Lippman (by email with the original to follow by

liabilities or condition of Holdings or Limited. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Payment of Deferred Consideration Pursuant to the Proof of Claim filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January I I, 2008, Limited has filed a proof of claim in respect of contingent, unliquidated claims (if any) (colle

N (1556) and MOTION TO CLARIFY (RE: [888] ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL, [1068] AMENDED ORDER) RE: APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER REGARDING SUBPOENA OF EPSTEIN, RELATED DOCUMENTS FILED BY CREDITOR RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC (1554) April 11, 2011 The above-styled cause came on for hearing before the HONORABLE

RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC (1554) April 11, 2011 The above-styled cause came on for hearing before the HONORABLE RAYMOND B. RAY, one of the Judges of the United States Bankruptcy Court, in and for the Southern District of Florida, at 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on Monday, April 11, 2011, c