Epstein Secrets

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC., ) CIVIL NO. ST-10-CV-443 Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ACTION FOR DAMAGES ) FANCELLI PANELING, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORAN

The Court will give a brief recitation of the facts and procedural history that are re evant to this Motion for Reconsideration? In 2005, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein contracted with J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. to de *gn a residential project on Little St. James. In its Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs attached as

of the proposal document, directions were given "to make your check payable J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd." Soon after entering into the agreement with Epstein, Mol eux contracted with Fancelli Paneling to install furniture and other paneling in the residence's I brary cabinetry. Upon discovering various d

(W.D. Pa. 1990). " Southeastern Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Training Fund v. Barsuli, 950 F. Supp. 1406, 1414 (E. Wis. 1997). EFTA00306392 Jetty Epstein and L.S.J., LLC. v. Fancelli Paneling Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 Memorandum Opinion Page 3 of 5 occasions. In this action for breach of contract

GIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC., ) CIVIL NO. ST-10-CV-4

the Rules of the District Cowl, the Ocderal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence." ° Bostic v. AT&T ophe V.I., 312 F. Supp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.I. 2004). 9 Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985). 1° F & M Distributors, In

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND St JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, FANCELLI PANELING, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. ST-10-CV-443 ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MEMORANDUM IN SU

Fancelli for breach cn EFTA00307562 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 Epstein etab vs. Fanelli Paneling, Inc. Super. Cs Case No. ST-10-CV-443 of contract and negligence because the Library Cabinetry is defective and installat

RGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND St JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, FANCELLI P

(MI Sept 15, 1986). 5 EFTA00307566 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 Epstein el at vs Fencelli Paneling, Inc. Super. Ct. Case Na ST-ID-CV-443 Defendant offered no evidence that localizing any discovery request in the event of n

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 M. 2004). "...[R]econsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF St THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, -vs- FANCELLI PANELING, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. ST-10-CV-443 ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED cr1 0 0 •

TRIAL DEMANDED cr1 0 0 • ist -:j • z MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24. 2011 Plaintiffs Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") submit this memorandum in support of their motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order entered on

lumns, and wood paneling for the Library in the Office Pavilion (the EFTA00307578 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration Epstein et at vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. Case No. ST-I 0-CV443 "Library Cabinetry"). As third party beneficiaries of that contract with Fancelli, Plaintif

RGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF St THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, -vs- FANCE

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 (D.C.V.I. 2004). "...[Rleconsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the co

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) NO. ST-10-CV-443 ) FANCELLI PANELING, INC., ) ) (CARROLL, J.) Defendant. ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION

ourt held that: EFTA00308324 ii Ii iI In the Factual and Procedural Background section of the Memorandum Opinion, the Court noted that in 2005 Epstein contracted with non-parties — "J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd., and Juan Pablo Molyneux (collectively, "Molyneux")" — to design a residential project on

rt of the Virgin Islands, bearing the Case No. 3:10-cv-00034, captioned 4 EFTA00308327 J.P.Molyneux Studio, Ltd. and Juan Pablo Molyneux against Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J. LLC. (the "Molyneux Action'), in which Molyncux alleges: [s]ubsequent to the execution of the Design Services Agreement, Plaintiffs, wi

IRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

he just relief for all existing parties. A motion for reconsideration is not for raising matters that could have been raised before, but were not. Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F. Stepp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.L 2004). 13 EFTA00308336 V. CONCLUSION Manifest injustice will resul

Source Document(s) 1 Source Document(s) IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL ESTATE CORP

initial decision, for rearguing matters already addressed by the court, or for raising arguments that could have been raised before but were not." Bostic v. AT&T of the V.I., 312 F.Supp. 2d 731, 733, 45 V.I. 553 (D.V.I. 2004). In its motion for reconsideration, North Shore made two arguments. First,

1:09:20 +0000 Bloomberg Good morning. Here's what you need to know to start your day. • Venture capital firms deny seeking PPP loans. • The Fed's Bostic warns the recovery is stalling. • Ghislaine Maxwell arrives in New York for hearing. Five Things You Need to Know A handful of venture capital fir

ikely to be formally charged and enter a plea on July 14. District Judge Alison Nathan proposed the hearing be held by videoconference. The former Jeffrey Epstein associate agreed to the remote hearing and the date in a letter to the judge. By the Way The Kansas City Chiefs locked in the NFL's most dynamic p

g be held by videoconference. The former Jeffrey Epstein associate agreed to the remote hearing and the da

e hearing be held by videoconference. The former Jeffrey Epstein associate agreed to the remote hearing an