Epstein Secrets

-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232,

09/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 0940469, 09-80581, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092.

d as Exhibit 1. 5. Some 13 days later, counsel for Jane Doe No. 4 flied a motion for protective order on September 9, 2009 attempting to prohibit MrEpstein's presence at the deposition. The Defendant immediately filed a response (an Emergency Motion) on September II, 2009 requesting that the coon enter

been justified, however, under these circumstances, it was grandstanding and improper. In that the Plaintiff has stated that she voluntary went to JE's home 50 plus times without trauma until she filed a lawsuit, this brief visual encounter from a distance should not have resulted in the unilater

Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 4 of 33 Page 4 the plaintiffs either directly or indirectly. However, there is no prohibition against Mr. F.pstein's attendance at a deposition where, as is reflected in the order, the communication wilt be made to the plaintiff solely through defense counsel wi

LORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACFI hereby Se that. On. day, hefoie me, an ACC* &if itithoiiiid to oaths and take ac/cnowledgmener, personally appeared Jeffrey E. Bpetein known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who wrimowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that

09-00419, 0940581, 0940656, 09-80802, 0941092. Defendant Epstein's Emergency Motion To Strike Plaintiff's Motion F

s the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epstein, and his attorney an opportunity to have this Co

-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0

e. 13. The undersigned and his partner, Mr. Luttier, had a court reporter and a videographer present. Additionally, Mr. Hill on behalf of C.M..A., Adam Langino on behalf of B.B., William Berger on behalf of three Plaintiffs were present for the deposition. 3 09/12/2019 Page CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency

80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ __:! Related Cases:

to counsel for the Plaintiff indicating that Mr. Epstein would be present at the deposition. A copy of tha

ter to counsel for the Plaintiff indicating that Mr. Epstein would be present at the deposition. A copy of tha

t .. Critton, Jr. Michail J. Pike Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

set of doors to the garage area. See affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and Igor Zinoviev, Exhibit 4 and 5, resp

t. Additionally, Mr. Hill on behalf of C.M .. A., Adam Langino on behalf of B.B., William Berger on behalf of t

he say? 4 A. She, she said she doesn't really know. I 5 guess she doesn't remember. She says that she was asked 6 if she knew about my going to Jeffrey Epstein's house, 7 and she told them that she gave me a ride there before. 8 Q. And was that true? 9 A. Yes. 10 1Okay. On how many times did your sist

the same conduct or what I would say lack of professionalism to do something like that. MR. EDWARDS: Well, but, obviously, the difference is Mr. Epstein's anonymity has not been protected in this case, and these victims have. So... MR. CRITTON: So it's okay to humiliate and embarrass someone and t

e; true? 4 A. No. 5 Q. You so if I ask you is it your testimony, 6 as you sit here today, that since the time you filed the 7 lawsuit against MrStein, you have never discussed 8 your lawsuit withM.? 9 A. No. 10 Q. That's not true — that's not correct? 11 A. What is not correct? 12 Q. All

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. VOLUME I Related cases: 0

EDWARDS: Well, but, obviously, the difference is Mr. Epstein's anonymity has not been protected in this case,

s, and I represent Jane Doe. ' MR. HILL: Jack Hill, on behalf (AM. MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, on behalf of Jane Does 2 through 8. MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino, on behalf of B.B. MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. MR EDWARDS: And, Mr. Critton, I don't think we've had this Cant Report

RITTON: Form. 18 THE WITNESS: I don't remember, ma'am. 19 BY MS. EZELL: 20 Q. Do you ever recall driving her by the 21 airport and showing her Jeffrey Epstein's plane? 22 MR. CRITTON: Form. 23 THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am. 24 BY MS. EZELL: 25 Q. Do you ever recall one time perhaps by Page 329 1 BY MS. E

N, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CASE NO: 08-CV-80993 CASE NO: 08-CV-80811 CASE NO: 08-CW80893 JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY tPSi e N, Defendant. Page 271 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA C

ere. 2 Q. All right. Would you just put BD where 3 the back door of the kitchen was, please? 4 Now, these young women that came to give 5 Mr. Epstein massages, would they usually come to 6 the kitchen door? 7 A. Yes, ma'am. 8 MR. CRITTON: Form. 9 BY MS. EZELL: 10 Q. Did any ever come to t

4 Now, these young women that came to give 5 Mr. Epstein massages, would they usually come to 6 the kitc

the names of any of the 14 programs -- computer programs -- 15 MR. WILLITS: I am missing something. 16 Whose questioning now? 17 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. 18 BY MR. LANGINO: 19 Q. Do you know the names of some of the main 20 computer programs that are used as part of your 21 routine as the house

4 Now, these young women that came to give 5 Mr. Epstein massages, would they usually come to 6 the kitc

RITTON: Form. 18 THE WITNESS: I don't remember, ma'am. 19 BY MS. EZELL: 20 Q. Do you ever recall driving her by the 21 airport and showing her Jeffrey Epstein's plane? 22 MR. CRITTON: Form. 23 THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am. 24 BY MS. EZELL: 25 Q. Do you ever recall one time perhaps by Page 329 1 BY MS. E

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00310278 Page 271 1 JANE DOE ea 6, USE NO: 08-CV-80994 2 Plaintiff, 3 Vs. JEFFREY tpSie81, Defendant. 6 7 8 WE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993 Plaintiff, vs. 9 JEFFREY EPSIEIN, 10 11 12 C.N.A., 13 Plaintiff, 14 Vs.

ere. 2 Q. All right. Would you just put BD where 3 the back door of the kitchen was, please? 4 Now, these young women that came to give 5 Mr. Epstein massages, would they usually come to 6 the kitchen door? 7 A. Yes, ma'am. 8 MR. CRITTON: Form. 9 BY MS. EZELL: 10 Q. Did any ever come to t

ow the names of any of the 14 programs — computer programs -- 15 MR. WILLITS: I am missing something. 16 Whose questioning now? 17 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. 18 BY MR. LANGINO: 19 Q. Do you know the names of some of the main 20 computer programs that are used as part of your 21 routine as the house

Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No.08•CV.80119•CIV•MARRAIJOIINSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff. n. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant. Related cases: 08.10232. 0840360. 9840381 08.10994. 0640993. 0840811. 08.80893. 09.80169. 09.10591.09.80656.09.80802.0941092 VIDEOT

RAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002595 EFTA00157548 Page 5 Page 7 1 PROIEEDINGS 1 2 - - - 2 Q. All right, sir. Did you ever work for Jeffrey 3 Deposition taken before Sandra W. Townsend. Court 3 Epstein? 4 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of 4 A. Yes, I did. 5 Flor

5 Page 7 1 PROIEEDINGS 1 2 - - - 2 Q. All right, sir. Did you ever work for Jeffrey 3 Deposition taken before Sandra W. Townsend. Court 3 Epstein? 4 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of 4 A. Yes, I did. 5 Florida at Large. in the above cause. 5 Q. In what capacity? 6 - -

23 Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does 23 A. No. 24 numbers two through eight. 24 Q. -- or an ad in the paper? 25 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. on behalf of 25 A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 Page 8 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 1 of a lot of res