Epstein Secrets

08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS Even though this particular case has been dismissed, defendant Jeffrey

e of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclosure of correspondence in that state ca

08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTERE

he underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein." Doc. 38, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, Order Closing

OF DOCUMENTS IN A SEPARATE STATE CASE. With regard to the use of the correspondence in the Epstein v. Edwards lawsuit, Epstein is remarkably asking this Federal Court to step into a dispute over the admissibility of evidence in that state proceeding. Epstein asserts that certain Florida Rules of Evidence will pre

08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS Even though this particular case has been dismissed, defendant Jeffrey

e of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclosure of correspondence in that state ca

08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTERE

he underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein." Doc. 38, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, Order Closing

OF DOCUMENTS IN A SEPARATE STATE CASE. With regard to the use of the correspondence in the Epstein v. Edwards lawsuit, Epstein is remarkably asking this Federal Court to step into a dispute over the admissibility of evidence in that state proceeding. Epstein asserts that certain Florida Rules of Evidence will pre

n FLSD Docket 05/28/2009 Page 4 of 6 DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION W

Motions To Compel Discovery And Replies Filed By Epstein Specifically Related To The Discoverability Of Pl

0 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2

with the same discovery requests pending before this Federal Court concerning the Plaintiffs' past sexual history.