Epstein Secrets

the misconduct demonstrated in the present case - Jeffrey Epstein’s use of discovery as a tactic with the ulterior m

Plaintiffs’ sexual histories with men other than Epstein; and now, by means of a badgering and berating th

O LAW The Magistrate Judge’s decision to grant Defendant Epstein a second day of deposition of Jane Doe No. 4, fo

below. I. Introduction and Summary Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s demonstrated strategy in defense of the

e also Pace v. City of Palmetto, 2007 WL 470477 (S.D.Fla. 2007) (granting one hour additional deposition ti

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY E

m in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings, in each of the above-captioned case

nd Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for

-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time of ten (10) days, until April 23, 2009. 4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs’ counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs’ cou

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ______________ __:! Related cases:

(493) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, resp

S ORDER ON NET WORTH DISCOVERY (493) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through h

laintiffs, Jane Doe Nos. 2-8', Appeal Pursuant to S.D.Fla. Mag.R.4. Defendant seeks an additional ten (JO)