4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
12 / 4
Mentions
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY E
of Documents on March 2, 2009. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein served Memoranda in opposition to these Motions
duction of Documents on March 2, 2009. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein served Memoranda in opposition to these
because of demands on Plaintiffs’ counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs’ counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs’ counsel also has an impending discovery deadl
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY E
m in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings, in each of the above-captioned case
nd Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for
because of demands on Plaintiffs’ counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs’ counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009 Page 2 of 5 - 3 - Scavella, case no. 09 -103
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY E
d First Set of Interrogatories, et al., pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above-captioned cases: (1) Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant’s First Request to Produce
b), and state as follows: 1. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above
laintiffs’ counsel in this case and in other cases and matters. This includes an initial appellate brief presently due on April 24, 2009, in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time until Apr
: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________
es as follows: 1. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above
, and states as follows: 1. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above
ate brief presently due on May 1, 2009, in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella, case no. 09 -103
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and School Bd.
Jack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONFL Bar
ORGANIZATIONFL Bar No.
ORGANIZATIONClerk of the Court
ORGANIZATIONEleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATIONScavella
PERSONCompel et al
ORGANIZATION