Epstein Secrets

ition date of September 22, 2009 at 10:00 A.M. in New York City, New York. Brunel is an important witness in this case, as he is a good friend of Epstein’s and has information regarding Epstein’s pattern and practice of obtaining young girls for sexual purposes, relevant issues not yet admitted by De

States during the time when Jane Doe was trying to take his depositon. In fact, on February 16, 2010, counsel for Jane Doe took the deposition of Jeffrey Epstein’s house manager, Janusz Banaziak. Mr. Banaziak was asked if he knew Mr. Brunel. In summary, he responded that he knew him as Mr. Epstein’s friend.

l. In summary, he responded that he knew him as Mr. Epstein’s friend. He elaborated that Mr. Brunel had stay

al purposes, relevant issues not yet admitted by Defendant Epstein. Shortly after Brunel was served, counsel for

010, counsel for Jane Doe took the deposition of Jeffrey Epstein’s house manager, Janusz Banaziak. Mr. B

should be required to show cause why her and/or she should not be held in contempt of court for making false representations. See, e.g., Acton v. Target Corp., 2009 WL 5214419 at *5 (W.D. Wash. 2009) (entering order to show cause why counsel should not be held in contempt for making false representations)

09 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. _______________ ./ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591,09-8065

d records from a "CMA" designation? Then, on May 20, 2009, C.M.A. capitulated and filed her Notice of Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discover

6,09-80802,09-81092 --------------~/ Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintifrs Response In Opposit

ed physician-patient privilege as it involved a complex medical issue); Alexander v. City of Bellingham, 2008 WL 2077970 (W.D. Wash. 2008); Grit v. Target Corp., 2008 WL 1777744 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Trenary v. Bush Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla. 2006)(responses to interrogatories placed plaint

new court filing that the two had no contact for more than a decade before his death in August 2019." Her attorneys wrote, "Ghislaine Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein." On Thursday, they "asked a federal judge in Manhattan to release her from jail on $5 million bond, arguing that she did not pose a flight risk and

to wear to prevent any possibility of her harming herself." According to correspondent Eva Pilgrim, Maxwell "'vigorously denies' charges she helped Epstein recruit, groom, and abuse three teenage girls in the mid 90s, and will 'fight any allegations' against her. But some of Epstein's alleged victims w

US Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen's review of the case." The Washington Tim

hypotheses." Target, MTV Blocked Ads From News Mentioning Protests. The Wall Street Journal (7/12, Haggin, Subscription Publication, 7.57M) reports Target Corp. and MTV have asked online news publishers not to run its ads in stories related to the Black Lives Matter movement. Target and other advertisers ha

DLA Piper Desai Law Firm PC Dinsmore & Shohl Epstein Becker Green Essex Court Chambers Farella Braun

ost Philadelphia 76ers Promontory Financial Group LLC Ranbaxy S&P Global Inc. State Bar of Arizona State Bar of California Sun Pharmaceutical Target Corp. Twitter Inc. Uber Technologies Inc. United Microelectronics Corporation United Services Automobile Association United States Olympic Committee

g Duval & Stachenfeld Earthjustice Edelson PC Epstein Becker Green Gibbons PC Harvey & Binnall Holla

olutionPoint International Inc. SoulCycle Inc. Spectrum Management Holding Co. Standard Chartered PLC State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Target Corp. Tenet Healthcare Corp. EFTA00032636 --- PAGE BREAK --- Real estate portal Homes.com is mounting a constitutional challenge to the Telephone Con