ed physician-patient privilege as it involved a complex medical issue); Alexander v. City of Bellingham, 2008 WL 2077970 (W.D. Wash. 2008); Grit v. Target Corp., 2008 WL 1777744 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Trenary v. Bush Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla. 2006)(responses to interrogatories placed plaint

should be required to show cause why her and/or she should not be held in contempt of court for making false representations. See, e.g., Acton v. Target Corp., 2009 WL 5214419 at *5 (W.D. Wash. 2009) (entering order to show cause why counsel should not be held in contempt for making false representations)

ost Philadelphia 76ers Promontory Financial Group LLC Ranbaxy S&P Global Inc. State Bar of Arizona State Bar of California Sun Pharmaceutical Target Corp. Twitter Inc. Uber Technologies Inc. United Microelectronics Corporation United Services Automobile Association United States Olympic Committee

olutionPoint International Inc. SoulCycle Inc. Spectrum Management Holding Co. Standard Chartered PLC State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Target Corp. Tenet Healthcare Corp. EFTA00032636 --- PAGE BREAK --- Real estate portal Homes.com is mounting a constitutional challenge to the Telephone Con