Epstein Secrets

ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JE

t 05/29/2009 Page 6 of 17 damages. For instance, witnesses may testify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain acts(s) that would negate or lessen her damages”). Each of Defendant’s victims whom

aid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participate

om [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury

nsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert

1, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Michael E. Dutko, Esq. Bogenschutz & Dutko 600 S. Andrews Ave, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein-: AMENDED NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Dutko: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern Distric

ate, so please advise her of the following changes. As you were previously advised, on June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors

on with civil litigation between the victims and Mr. Epstein. The Special Master selected Robert Josefsberg, E

e, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein-: AMENDED NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VI

he victims in connection with civil litigation between the victims and Mr. Epstein. The Special Master selected Robert Josefsberg, Esq. of the firm Podhurst Orseck, P.A., a highly-respected and experienced attorney. Ms. is not obligated to use Mr. Josefsberg as her civil attorney, but, as explained in eater detail

9 Page 1 of 8 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. J

[email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & W

aw.com [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldbe

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 0

2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ----------------'! JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA!JOHNSON vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. --------------

[email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & W

aw.com [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldbe

in this Motion. Mr. Critton advised that the Defendant does not oppose the Motion or the relief sought herein. DATED this 19th day of June, 2009. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Respectfully submitted, By: Robert C. Josefsberg Robert C. Josefsberg, Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

9 Page 1 of 8 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. J

[email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & W

aw.com [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldbe

ve electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.

aw.com [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldbe

2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I --------------- JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I ------------

[email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & W

in this Motion. Mr. Critton advised that the Defendant does not oppose the Motion or the relief sought herein. DATED this 22nd day of June, 2009. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Respectfully submitted, By: s/Robert C. Josefsberg Robert C. Josefsberg, Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2009 Page 1 of 8 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DO

[email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Go 1 dberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger &

aw.com [email protected] Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Go 1 dberger, Esq. Atterbury, Gold

vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON

FOR SPECIAL MASTER TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS This Agreement is made this day of , 2009, by and between the "First Party," Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his attorneys, Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP, and the "Second Party," defined as the attorney representative,

TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS This Agreement is made this day of , 2009, by and between the "First Party," Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his attorneys, Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP, and the "Second Party," defined as the attorney representative, Robert C.

ay of , 2009, by and between the "First Party," Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his attorneys

s, Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP, and the "Second Party," defined as the attorney representative, Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ("Podhurst Orseck"). WHEREAS, there exists an agreement between the United States Attorney's Office ("USAO") and Epstein known as the Non-Prosecuti