Epstein Secrets

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 3:36 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin Nowak Subject: Mobjects and Replisomes Attachments: signature.asc Dear Jeffrey, thank you for an inspiring afternoon! I believe that th

Joscha Bach Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 3:36 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin Nowak Subject: Mobjects and Replisomes Attachments: signature.asc Dear Jeffrey, thank you for an inspiring afternoon! I believe that the 'mobjects' that =ou have been talking about are going to become a very hot topic. They =u

Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 3:36 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin Nowak Subject: Mobjects and Replisomes

a Bach Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 3:36 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin Nowak Subject: Mobjects and Rep

e. Mathematically, we can probably treat them as =irected hypergraphs with typed links, but we rarely go to that level of =escription. I guess that Carnap and Tarski delivered the first =ncarnations of the modern theories on them, and every comprehensive =heory of thinking, planning and language has to

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky < Subj

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky <

talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at noon, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the first time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 6:57 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: I read what his ghost-writer=said about him. Pretty scary. > Reminds me of something I=was told by Jon Snow, one

< Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 6:57 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: I read what

:59 AM, Noam Chomsky mailto wrote: > > For word meani=gs, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meani=g postulates, in Carnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one ha= toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't se= how to work it out, or to extend it to t

ld models. Noam On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM, jeffrey E. < [email protected] > wrote: one of donalds clo

26, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Noam Chomsky • wrote: For word meanings, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in Carnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't see how to work it out, or to extend it to the

n it. Quite a departure from a rich tradition which in the modern period goes back to Galileo and the great figures of modern science. Noam From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 1:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: I told ehud , how you and valeria were both tho

talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at noon, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the first time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:14 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: ill work on the 16th <=r> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at

talks. Best =ime for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at n=on, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the f=rst time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people tal=ed languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,