Epstein Secrets

low it." Mr. Acosta had a lengthy discussion with Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia. on what critics said was the lenient plea deal given to Jeffrey E. Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of paying underage girls for sexual massages. Mr. Acosta defended the deal and said it was offered based on the evidenc

lthy financier accused of paying underage girls for sexual massages. Mr. Acosta defended the deal and said it was offered based on the evidence. Mr. Epstein, he noted, V/85 required to register as a sex offender. Mr. Acosta also seemed to question Mr. Trump's proposal to cut the Labor Departments budget

critics said was the lenient plea deal given to Jeffrey E. Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of paying u

critics said was the lenient plea deal given to Jeffrey E. Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of paying un

l and said it was offered based on the evidence. Mr. Epstein, he noted, V/85 required to register as a sex off

he George W. Bush administration. R. Alexander Acosta, the nominee for labor secretary. also defended his decision as the United States attorney in Southern Florida to offer a lenient plea deal to a wealthy New Yorker accused of paying underage girls for sexual acts. For nearly three hours in front of the Senat

Federal Bureau of Investigation Record/Information Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015 I sent a letter to you to describe the history of my attempts to have the FBI provide FOIA mandated disclosures r

eopened the above-numbered FOIA request and stated that it had started its processing and searching for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay the costs of copying. In the 27 1/2 months since the FBI reopened the request and agreed it was req

ster, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015 I sent

hing for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay

was not currently scheduled and would not begin until, at earliest, October. Given the lengthy delays due to the second level reviews conducted in Southern Florida by either the USAO or FBI, it predictably will therefore take, at the very minimum, 5'/z months from the prior production in May until a third "bat

Federal Bureau of Investigation Record/Information Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015, I sent a letter to you, which I have attached, to describe the history of my attempts to have the FBI provide FO

opened the above- numbered FOIA request and stated that it had started its processing and searching for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay the costs of copying. As of the date of my May 1 communication, despite the passage of two years,

ster, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015, I sen

ing for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay

A00585007 given the further foreseeable delay resulting from the past practice of sending the redacted documents for a second level FOIA review in Southern Florida by either the USAO or FBI, predictably it will take, at the very minimum, 5 Y2 months from the prior production in May until a third "batch" would

Federal Bureau of Investigation Record/Information Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015, I sent a letter to you, which I have attached, to describe the history of my attempts to have the FBI provide FO

opened the above- numbered FOIA request and stated that it had started its processing and searching for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay the costs of copying. As of the date of my May 1 communication, despite the passage of two years,

ster, VA 22602-4483 RE: Request No 1203982-001 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Mr. Argall: On May I, 2015, I sen

ing for responsive records. On June 24, 2013, on Mr. Epstein's behalf, the FBI was informed that we would pay

A00585009 given the further foreseeable delay resulting from the past practice of sending the redacted documents for a second level FOIA review in Southern Florida by either the USAO or FBI, predictably it will take, at the very minimum, 5 Y2 months from the prior production in May until a third "batch" would

tigation 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. DC 20535 EVA IL ADDRESSES: RE: FBI Request No 1203982-001/ DOJ OIP Appeal AP-2013-01397 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Ms. Pustay, and Mr. On March 20, 2013 the OIP determined that the FBI could not rely on 5 USC § 552(b)(7)(A) as a basis to withhold all rec

2013 the OIP determined that the FBI could not rely on 5 USC § 552(b)(7)(A) as a basis to withhold all records of past investigations regarding Mr. Epstein's prior FBI FOIA requests. On April 25, 2013, the FBI reopened the above-numbered FOIA request and stated that it had started its processing and se

est No 1203982-001/ DOJ OIP Appeal AP-2013-01397 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Ms. Pustay, and Mr. On March 20

hold all records of past investigations regarding Mr. Epstein's prior FBI FOIA requests. On April 25, 2013, th

cheduled and would not begin until, at earliest, October of 2015. Given the lengthy delays due which include second level FOIA reviews conducted in Southern Florida by either the USAO or FBI, it predictably will take, at the vet), minimum, 5 Y2 months from the prior production in May until a third "batch" would

extent that the government intends to include statements made to other alleged "minor victims" not specifically identified, Ms. "Statements made by Epstein to friends and Family of Minor Victims," "Statements made by CC-2 to friends and Family of Minor Victims," and "Statements made by Jeffrey Epstein

s made by Epstein to friends and Family of Minor Victims," "Statements made by CC-2 to friends and Family of Minor Victims," and "Statements made by Jeffrey Epstein to the Minor Victims or in their presence." EFTA00040119 November 8, 2021 Page 2 Maxwell objects. In addition, these categories do not contain a

York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 150 Eost lath Avenue Denver, Co PH

ment as "minor victims" in the indictment or correspondence to defense counsel dated October 11, 2021. There were many alleged minor victims in the Southern Florida state and federal investigations. To the extent that the government intends to include statements made to other alleged "minor victims" not specific

From: Darren Indyke Sent: 5/10/2019 11:01:49 PM To: [email protected]; Martin Weinberg cc: Darren Indyke [ Subject: Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide | Miami Herald Attachments: Jeffrey Sloman-Article-201401221517.jpg; alexander-acosta-ap071010029016-cropped.jpg I

1517.jpg; alexander-acosta-ap071010029016-cropped.jpg Importance: — High https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article226168500.html Top aide of Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor Acosta: We acted with integrity February 15, 2019 12:17 PM Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually a

3 ,/-_ U.S. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta has been criticized for the plea deal he worked out with Jeffrey Epstein. Acosta was U.S. attorney for Southern Florida at the time. Alan Diaz Instead, Epstein — whose friends included President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton and other politically connect

mind the effect that the agreement would have on Mr. Epstein.” Where are they now? The biggest players in the

tment of Justice, Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 RE: FBI Request No 1203982-001/ DOJ OIP Appeal AP-2013-01397 (Jeffrey Epstein) Dear Ms. Pustay and Mr. O'Neill: On March 29, 2013, the OIP determined that the FBI could not rely on 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A) as a basis to withhold

hold all records of past investigations regarding Mr. Epstein's prior FBI FOIA request. On April 25, 2013, the

tly scheduled and would not begin until, at earliest, October 2015. Given the lengthy delays due which include second level FOIA reviews conducted in Southern Florida by either the USAO or FBI, it predictably will take, at the very minimum, 5 ½ months from the prior production in May until a third "batch" would be