Epstein Secrets

ion"). One does not need to engage in complex analysis to understand what has happened here: the government has sought to substitute our client for Jeffrey Epstein, even if it means stretching—and ultimately exceeding—the bounds of the law. Yet, it is in precisely this setting—involving a defendant who, despit

en short of its obligations here. The indictment must be dismissed. The government's sudden zeal to prosecute Ms. Maxwell for alleged conduct with Epstein in the 1990s—conduct for which the government never even charged Epstein—follows a history that is both highly unusual and deeply troubling. The gov

ohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN &

to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities"); United States v. Ashraf, 320 F. App'x 26, 28 (2d Cir. 2009) (plea agreement "by its express terms, bound only the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virgin

ion"). One does not need to engage in complex analysis to understand what has happened here: the government has sought to substitute our client for Jeffrey Epstein, even if it means stretching—and ultimately exceeding—the bounds of the law. Yet, it is in precisely this setting—involving I defendant who, despit

en short of its obligations here. The indictment must be dismissed. The government's sudden zeal to prosecute Ms. Maxwell for alleged conduct with Epstein in the 1990s—conduct for which the government never even charged Epstein—follows I history that is both highly unusual and deeply troubling. The gov

overnment has sought to substitute our client for Jeffrey Epstein, even if it means stretching—and ultimat

to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities"); United States v. Ashraf, 320 F. App'x 26, 28 (2d Cir. 2009) (plea agreement "by its express terms, bound only the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virgin

king wi FroM Sent: Wednesday. June 12 7019 11:54 AM wrote: who was amenable to sending them the files directly. Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) give me a call when you have a chance. Thanks From Sent: Friday, June 07, 2019 4:11 PM Subject: FW: records management (Epstein in

y sensitive documents (such as medical records, personnel records, etc.): U.S. v. Chambe U.S. V. Adelglas U.S. V. Ng Lap U.S. V. Tortora, U.S. V. Ashraf U.S. V. Goldbre U.S. v. Vargas, U.S. V. Krupkin, U.S. v. Cruz, ov In terms of the vendor, we choose from a small number of organizations that wor

of yesterday afternoon. Below is the long email history on this issue. Fro Sent: monaay, June Z4, 2019 11:4/ AM Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) Hey I. Wanted to follow up on the scanning issue — I know Florida had said they'd get you an answer last Monday, but I take it they

y sensitive documents (such as medical records, personnel records, etc.): U.S. v. Chamb6 U.S. v. Adelgla U.S. v. Ng Lap U.S. v. Tortoro, U.S. v. Ashraf U.S. v. Goldbre U.S. v. Vargas, U.S. v. Krupkin, EFTA00037464 --- PAGE BREAK --- U.S. v. Cruz, overdose deat In terms of the vendor, we choos