Epstein Secrets

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, I Subject: Re: Bradley

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, I Subject: Re: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:21:10 +0000 Importance: Normal I intend to strongly discourage this, no upside to you, no upside to alan, will not be he

ed to you in the public media express a willingness, indeed a strong desire, to submit to questioning under oath regarding your alleged knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's extensive abuse of underage females as well as your alleged personal participation in those activities. As I am sure you will recall, our efforts to

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, I Subject: Re: Brad

e after From: jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:55 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Cc: Kendell Coffey (new) ; Martin G Weinberg ; Ken Sweder ; Harvey Silverglate ; Mr. Mark Fabiani Subject: Re: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein this case was dismissed on summary judgement, ??? they filed an appeal. not sure of stan

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg"

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:22:30 +0000 agreed, there is no case anymore. makes no sense. . On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < wr

ed to you in the public media express a willingness, indeed a strong desire, to submit to questioning under oath regarding your alleged knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's extensive abuse of underage females as well as your alleged personal participation in those activities. As I am sure you will recall, our efforts to

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinb

e after From: jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:55 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Cc: Kendell Coffey (new) ; Martin G Weinberg ; Ken Sweder ; Harvey Silverglate • Mr. Mark Fabiani Subject: Re: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein this case was dismissed on summary judgement, ??? they filed an appeal. not sure of stan

pecializes in sex 11 trafficking. 12 I needed to call them to prove what I knew 10:15:49 13 immediately, that the only time I was ever at 14 Jeffrey Epstein's ranch was when I went to visit the 15 Ashes in New Mexico. I spoke to their daughter, the 16 prosecutor's, class. She was then in high school, 1

heir daughter, the 16 prosecutor's, class. She was then in high school, 17 and took a day trip to Santa Fe. 18 Ashe had known -- had heard that Jeffrey 10:16:15 19 Epstein had bought a ranch, a very large ranch in 20 New Mexico and Ashe was very interested in the 21 outdoors and asked me if I

prosecutor's, class. She was then in high school, 17 and took a day trip to Santa Fe. 18 Ashe had known -- had heard that Jeffrey 10:16:15 19 Epstein had bought a ranch, a very large ranch in 20 New Mexico and Ashe was very interested in the 21 outdoors and asked me if I would do him a favor an

ecords and where my records are 2 kept and I've asked her to perform paralegal service 3 in addition to her loving service as my wife. 4 Q. Is Harvey Silverglate representing you now 10:02:04 5 with regard to this litigation? 6 A. Yes. 10:02:08 7 Q. Is Mark Fabiani representing you now with 10:02:09

: 191694 The Suppression of Science: The Case of Jeffrey MacDonald A case in which science has not yet pr

ecently ordered the district court to consider all the new “evidence as a whole.” So the case is far from over. I continue to confer on the case with Harvey Silverglate, who was MacDonald’s classmate at Princeton and who was my co-counsel in the earlier Habeus Corpus appeal. Whatever happens, I believe that Jeffrey