Epstein Secrets

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacatioMagmail.com>, <I Subject: ATTORNEY-CL

@mail.com> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff <1111111■ Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to be cut some and there will be other queries and I continue to smooth and tinker, but this is getting

at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to

to the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst

and realize there are other perspectives. From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 5:23 PM To: Mar

l Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com> To: "Martin G. Weinberg"

[email protected]> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> c It will probably have to be cut some and there will be other queries and I continue to smooth and tinker, but this is gett

at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> c It will probably have

to the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst

and realize there are other perspectives. From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 5:23 PM To: Mar

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation4gmail.eom>, <I Subject: Re: ATTORNE

[email protected]> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff < Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to be cut some and there will be other queries and I continue to smooth and tinker, but this is getting

at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to

to the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation4gmail.eom>, <I Subject: Re: ATT

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

ents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) ..00...0.. eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeneene 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................. 8 io)

er intervening causes of emotional distress and related damages (Motion in Limine 14) 23 15. Plaintiff's lies about her age and the year she met Mr. Epstein must be exposed to the Jury (Motion in Limine 15)... cccccccccccssenseecseeessecssecsecsseesseeeseecssessecsesteesteeens 24 16. All of Plaintiff’s m

aintiff's lies about her age and the year she met Mr. Epstein must be exposed to the Jury (Motion in Limine 15

all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claims (Motion in Limine 17) ................0005 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) ooo... cecccecccccccccesscececsseececsseeeceseescesseesssueescnsssescessees