Epstein Secrets

ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff Case No. 15-cv-07433-RWS v. HEARING REQUESTED Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA Mr. Epstein respectfully requests that he be permitted to be heard on his Motio

WS v. HEARING REQUESTED Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA Mr. Epstein respectfully requests that he be permitted to be heard on his Motion to Quash. Far from being an "important witness," as plaintiff asserts, Jeffrey

HEARING REQUESTED Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO HIS MO

RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA Mr. Epstein respectfully requests that he be permitted to be

the matter on trial, but that is not the case here. In neither United States v. International Bus. Machines Corp., 90 F.R.D. 377 (S.D.N.Y. 1981), or Napier v. 1 EFTA00589510 Bassard, 102 F.2d 467 (2d Cir. 1939), on which the plaintiff relies, Response at 2, did the witnesses at issue assert their Fi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff Case No v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA Far from being an "important witness," as plaintiff asserts, Jeffrey Epstein wo

he jury. Plaintiff has not provided the Court with any reason which withstands scrutiny as to why it would further the interests of justice for Mr. Epstein to be compelled to appear personally to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege. Indeed, the weakness of plaintiff's arguments provides additional com

tiff Case No v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO HIS MO

hy it would further the interests of justice for Mr. Epstein to be compelled to appear personally to assert hi

the matter on trial, but that is not the case here. In neither United States v. International Bus. Machines Corp., 90 F.R.D. 377 (S.D.N.Y. 1981), or Napier v. Bassard, 102 F.2d 467 (2d Cir. 1939), on which the plaintiff relies, Response at 2, did the witnesses at issue assert their Fifth Amendment priv

N/A EFTA01655478 Hyperlink(s) N/A The following subject mentioned in the news sources have been previously reported but remain in the news: . Jeffrey Epstein investigation (reported on 3/17/2025) Please note: Due to time constraints, the information reported was reviewed and obtained from the 5:00AM draft

usly reported but remain in the news: . Jeffrey Epstein investigation (reported on 3/17/2025) Please not

n previously reported but remain in the news: . Jeffrey Epstein investigation (reported on 3/17/2025) Pl

MIE> To: "Cornelius, Janet Lee IMD FBI)" "P Shannon Vh (IMD) (FBI)" , "Hall, JoHanna G. IMD FBI " "Saunders-Green, Vanessa Victoria IMD FBI " , "Napier, Arnie Marie IMD (FBI)" "Driver Christina L. , IMD) (FBI)" "Hammer, Shannon R. HQ- DIV17-FO-MAPA-Support-Grou "Cooper, Kathl)n (IMD) (FBI)" ,

62 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013562 The Shape of Space, Jeffrey Weeks, Dekker, NY, 1985 The Topological Picture B

maticians said even 12 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013512 Descartes, the essential Enlightenment rationalist, was responsive to his “...call of the Spirit...” Napier the inventor of logarithms wrote an exegetical commentary on the Book of Revelations. The mathematician and physicist, Pascal, believing that contact