Epstein Secrets

BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ ___;/ DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS (dated 03/23/09) 14] 023/031 D

unsel, and hereby files this Motion for Injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64, for appointment of a receiver to take charge of Epstein's property, and to post a $15 million bond to secure any potential judgment in this case, for the reasons explained in the accompanying supporting

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionair

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionaire

IS ASSETS. As noted in the material facts above, defendant Epstein is currently making fraudulent transfers of his

ve person lmowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Utah since 1992. My office is located at the University of Utah College of Law, where I am a law professor. Along with other attorneys, I represent plaintiff Jane Doe in this matter. 2. It appears that defendant Jeffrey Epstei

ugh his undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein seeks Summary Judgment on the claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution set forth in Brad Edwards’ Fourth Amended Counterclaim. Each of th

Epstein. Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a nexual preference for young children. Depos

al complaint with obstruction of justice in eanneetinn with trying to obtain $50,000 from civil attorneys pursuing civil sexual assault cases against Rpatein as payment for producing the book to the attorneys. See Criminal Complaint at 4, US. v. Rodriguez, No. 9:10-CR-80015-KAM (S.D. Fla. 2010) (Exhibit “G

stein hee ‘also ‘Heei sanvedl: “with: nterrogatories ‘ad ‘requests. “for . 7 » production; all requests. have been met: with 5th amendment assertions Pane Epstein’ has not given Tan Ween oe By: ' Jane, Doe's: complaint: contains. a punitive ‘damages: clainn, and Mr Tistein: he “also. . a elected: to tiivoke th

ion that any of those people (other than. . Mr- Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or.any of the other. specific victims of Mr. '- .Epstein’s molestation. Mr. Dershowitz ‘is acting as an ‘attorney for Mr. Epstein, and therefore it is. ; 4 presumably unlikely to question him about any admi

rls, along with attorney Jay Howell (an attomey in Jacksonville, Florida with Jay Howell & Associates) and Professor Paul Cassell (a law professor at the University of Utah College Of Law). I filed state court actions on behalf of L.M. and E.W. and a federal court action on behalf of Jane Doe. All of the cases were filed in the summer