Epstein Secrets

04/02/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA.JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF. JANE DOE NO. 2. To ANSWER DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE OB

rogatories nos. 10 and 14 are presently resolved. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Page 2 of 9 Doe 2 v. Epstein Page No. 2 Also, Defendant has filed simultaneously with this motion a Motion To Compel directed to certain of Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant'

resses and phone numbers of all males, excluding Mr. Epstein, with whom you have had sexual activity since age

2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF. JANE DOE NO. 2. To

1 [email protected] Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully sub By: __ -1-:....::.. _

reasonable expenses, including expenses, associated with the making of this motion. Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rules 7.1 and 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states: Introduction Prior to the filing of this motion, counsel for Defendant and counsel for Plaintiff cor

4/02/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA.JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ----------------'' DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE NO. 2, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE

ues as to production request no. 14 are presently Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Page 2 of 12 Doe 2 v. Epstein Page No. 2 resolved. This motion addresses those requests on which the parties were unable to come to an agreement. Also, Defendant has filed sim

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ----------------'' DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE NO. 2, TO

1 [email protected] Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully sub By: c-=-:::-:::-,:::--

reasonable expenses, including expenses, associated with the making of this motion. Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rules 7 .1 and 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states: Introduction Prior to the filing of this motion, counsel for Defendant and counsel for Plaintiff cor

JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________

es are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

tive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

iversal Tile Restoration, Inc., 2008 WL 2620735 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Co., 107 F.3d

ugh his undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein seeks Summary Judgment on the claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution set forth in Brad Edwards’ Fourth Amended Counterclaim. Each of th

Epstein. Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a nexual preference for young children. Depos

al complaint with obstruction of justice in eanneetinn with trying to obtain $50,000 from civil attorneys pursuing civil sexual assault cases against Rpatein as payment for producing the book to the attorneys. See Criminal Complaint at 4, US. v. Rodriguez, No. 9:10-CR-80015-KAM (S.D. Fla. 2010) (Exhibit “G