Epstein Secrets

EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/1/2006 State Attorney Barry E. ICrischer Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town

McSorley. B-15 12/7/2007 Sloman Lilly Ann Sanchez Letter - 1 pages with Affirmation signed by Epstein and Notice of Hearing, State of Florida I. Jeffrey Epstein, attached 12/7/2007 Victim notification letter prepared 12/7/2007 at 9:10 pm B-6 12/7/2007 Unmailed victim notification letters B-14 12/10/200

hat there are some inaccuracies and omissions in Mr. Epstein's fde. i 12/ 11/2008 Villafatia, cc: Senior

a 9/2/2008 Richard H. Willits), #4, #13, #8 (via Jeffrey Herman), #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #17 (via Theodore Leopold), #20, #21, #23, #24, #25 (via Jeffrey B \ , ' Herman), #26 (via Jeffrey Herman), #30, #31, #32, #33, #37 (via Michael E. Dutko), #38, #44 (via Jeffrey Herman) 9/3/2008 Victim notific

Vitiator-1a Critton Letter re NPA with attached Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Jane D

. Marie Villafafia Lilly Ann Sanchez Because of the Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's ti investigation for almost two years, E stein hired counsel for all employees so contact Ms. Sanchez for contact information for the attorneys. I 1/22/2007 Andrew Lourie Lilly Ann Sanchez

nity control," and agree that the girls are victims for purposes of damages. Also includes deadlines for a plea and sentencing date 46 9/11/2007 A. Oosterbaan A. Marie Villafaila Email re status of negotiations with attached correspondence 48 9/11/2007 Lefcourt Villafafia Email with 4 page NPA attac

) From: Sloman. Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:26 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Epstein Fyi Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) To: '[email protected]. <JLefkowitz@kirklan

[email protected]> To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Mon Oct 22 17:10:00 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein Jeff -- I will review these materials this evening and be in touch with you tomorrow with the expectation of wrapping this up by nd of the day. One que

McSorley. R I s 12/7/2007 Sloman Lilly Ann Sanchez Letter -1 pages with Affirmation signed by Epstein and Notice of Heating, State of Florida I. Jeffrey Epstein, attached 12/7/2007 Victim notification letter prepared 12/7/2007 at 9:10 pm B-6 12/7/2007 Unmailed victim notification letters B-14 12/10/200

the attorney representative be told clearly that Mr. Epstein has agreed to pay the lawyer's hourly rate only f

a 9/2/2008 Richard H. Willits), #4, #13, #8 (via Jeffrey Herman), #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #17 (via Theodore Leopold), #20, #21, #23, #24, #25 (via Jeffrey B-89 Herman), #26 (via Jeffrey Herman), #30, #31, #32, #33, #37 (via Michael E. Dutko), #38, #44 (via Jeffrey Herman) 9/3/2008 Victim notificatio

Villafafia Critton Letter rc NPA with attached Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Jane D

nity control," and agree that the girls are victims for purposes of damages. Also includes deadlines for a plea and sentencing date 46 9/11/2007 A. Oosterbaan A. Marie Villafaiia Email re status of negotiations with attached correspondence 48 9/11/2007 Lefcourt Villafatia Email with 4 page NPA attac

tion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas 6(e) Box #3 P-012089 Thru P-012129 United States' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel 6(e) Box #3 P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(

admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except

of 23 EFTA00191231 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Box #3 P-011923 Thru P-011966 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to Andrew Lourie with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/25/2007 letter fro

Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and i

ation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an ag

x #3 P-013554 Thai File folder labeled "E-mails Re Plea Negotiations" containing: ■ 11/28/07 e-mail from A. Lourie to A. Marie Villafafta, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia re non-prosecution agreement, with attached correspondence; ■ 9/19/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Louric, R. Garcia, K. A

l prosecutorial authority. IO 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001653 EFTA00209832 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

ly aware, the Department's prior review of this matter was incomplete and, by its own admission, not "de novo." See Tab 38, May 15, 2008 Letter from A. Oosterbaan. Without considering the Non Prosecution Agreement that left this matter to be resolved in the State or any of the misconduct, CEOS reviewers, task

provide notice to the victims. It is also needed to demonstrate why the victims at first received inaccurate information about the NPA, as well as Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in that inaccurate notice. See, e.g., DE 48 at 15-16. 43. RFP No. 16 requests documents regarding Bruce Reinhart, a senior prosecutor w

ch re Travel for Prostitution" containing attorney (Villafafta) handwritten notes regarding grand jury presentation, chart entitled "Brought to Epstein's House" with handwritten notes, Message Pad meta- analysis chart, summary of evidence related to one victim/witness, and relevant grand jury inf

serted Victims' Objections Box #3 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments Work product No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; P-011923 from JE Counsel" containing: Deliberative process Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Crime-Fraud- Thru ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann 6(e) Misconduct; Not in A

of course, is a defense attorney who represented defendant Epstein. Recording information provided by a defense att

net (617) 338-9538 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 3 EFTA00179621

ation; Ordinary Government ■ 11/28/07 e-mail from A. Lourie to Investigative Privilege Communication; No Attorney-Client A. Marie Villafatia, A. Oosterbaan, IL Garcia re non-prosecution agreement, with attached correspondence; Relationship; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Pub

nt of Justice Dear Mr. Facsimile: Dir. Fax I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having informed us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as w

ain why we believe that a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having

ully request, and what I hope you will provide, is a truly "de novo" review that is, an independent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both necessary and warranted in view of the legal and evidentiary hurdles that have been identified, the existence of a State felony plea and se

dent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both necessary and warranted in view of the l

ly aware, the Department's prior review of this matter was incomplete and, by its own admission, not "de novo." See Tab 38, May 15, 2008 Letter from A. Oosterbaan. Without considering the Non Prosecution Agreement that left this matter to be resolved in the State or any of the misconduct, CEOS reviewers, task

"Victim Civil Suits" Not privileged. Produced to counsel for Petitioners N/A Box #1 P-003664 Thru P-003678 File folder entitled "Research it JE Websites" containing attorney research Work product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation;

re Travel for Prostitution" containing attorney (Villafaria) handwritten notes regarding grand jury presentation, chart entitled "Brought to Epstein's House" with handwritten notes, Message Pad meta- analysis chart, summary of evidence related to one victim/witness, and relevant grand jury i

ecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013836 Thru P-013837 Palm Beach Daily News Article, "Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Thrown Out," with attorney's notes written on margin Atty work-product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty;

recusal of Southern District of Florida, dated July 29, 2011, with attached memorandum from A. Marie Villafafia to Benjamin Greenberg summarizing Jeffrey E stein Investi ation Attorney-Client Privilege Deliberative Process Work Product No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation

ation; Ordinary Government ■ 11/28/07 e-mail from A. Lourie to Investigative Privilege Communication; No Attorney-Client A. Marie Villafafia, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia re non-prosecution agreement, with attached correspondence; Relationship; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against P

e and K. Atkinson re proposed correspondence to Jay Lefkowitz Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013281 Handwritten note re Epstein investigation Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Investigative privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who

led "8/5/08 AMCV e-mail re correct agrmt" containing 8/5/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to R. Black and J. Goldberger concerning the binding nature of the Agreement Attorne

costa, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email fro

x #3 P-013554 Thru File folder labeled "E-mails Re Plea Negotiations" containing: ■ 11/28/07 e-mail from A. Laurie to A. Marie Villafafta, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia re non-prosecution agreement, with attached correspondence; ■ 9/19/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Lourie, R. Garcia, K. A

uring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual ina

nds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First A

ely aware, the Department’s prior review of this matter was incomplete and, by its own admission, not “de novo.” See Tab 38, May 15, 2008 Letter from A. Oosterbaan. Without considering the Non Prosecution Agreement that left this matter to be resolved in the State or any of the misconduct, CEOS reviewers, tasked

BMISSION HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012141 --- PAGE BREAK --- KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessman and noted philanthropist with no prior criminal record, has been investigated for potential violations of

OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessm

OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessma

m 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having informed us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as we

uring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual ina

nds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First A

ely aware, the Department’s prior review of this matter was incomplete and, by its own admission, not “de novo.” See Tab 38, May 15, 2008 Letter from A. Oosterbaan. Without considering the Non Prosecution Agreement that left this matter to be resolved in the State or any of the misconduct, CEOS reviewers, tasked