Epstein Secrets

ings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d

e minor children as Guardian Ad Lltem." Fhl6. The Former Husband's motion has the rather lengthy title of "Emergency Mo- tion For Rehearing and For En Banc Re- Page 5 view of the Court's Ex Parte Order Grant- ing the Wife's Motion to Stay Execution of a Child Custody Order, Without Waiting for the Hus

dings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 1.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 Eld at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d 4

e minor children as Guardian Ad Litern." FN6. The Former Husband's motion has the rather lengthy title of "Emergency Mo- tion For Rehearing and For En Banc Re- Page 6 of 11 Page 5 view of the Court's Ex Parte Order Grant- ing the Wife's Motion to Stay Execution of a Child Custody Order, Without Waitin

ings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick. 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d

he minor children as Guardian Ad Litem." FN6. The Former Husband's motion has the rather lengthy title of 'Emergency Mo- tion For Rehearing and For En Banc Re- Page 6 of 11 Page 5 view of the Court's Ex Parte Order Grant- ing the Wife's Motion to Stay Execution of a Child Custody Order, Without Waitin