Epstein Secrets

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

Or- ange County, Fla. v. Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 397 So.2d 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Florida Civil Practice Guide, Vol. 6, § 143.03 (Lexis Publishing 1998). (Ill Rule 9.020 defines the "parties" to an appeal as the "appellant" and the "appellee." Neither the Former Husband nor the Former Wife so

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

9); Or- ange County, Fla. Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 397 .2d 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Florida Civil Practice Guide, Vol. 6, § 143.03 (Lexis Publishing 1998). (Ill Rule 9.020 defines the "parties" to an appeal as the "appellant" and the "appellee." Neither the Former Husband nor the Former Wife so

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

Or- ange County, Fla. v. Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 397 So.2d 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Florida Civil Practice Guide, Vol. 6, § 143.03 (Lexis Publishing 1998). [II) Rule 9.020 defines the "parties" to an appeal as the "appellant" and the "appellee." Neither the Former Husband nor the Former Wife so